June 7, 2017 By David Strom 2 min read

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently released a draft of its Digital Identity Guidelines that included some significant and noteworthy changes. While the public comment period has closed, the document still has to go through an internal review process that is expected to last until the end of this summer.

Big Changes to the NIST Guidelines

The latest document removed three items that were previously part of the firm’s federal recommendations and guidelines on passwords.

  • Password complexity rules: Having a specific composition such as mixed case or symbols is old-school thinking. Many users figure out ways around these rules by substituting characters for letters, which are well-known to fraudsters anyway.
  • Regularly scheduled password changes: Passwords should be changed when a breach occurs or after a specific threat. Users often end up defeating the purpose by making simple changes to their passwords when required, such as adding a number on the end, that are easily guessed.
  • Password hints and knowledge-based questions: These don’t work, especially since social network posts and social engineering schemes make it easier to figure the answers out.

Instead, the NIST recommended that security tools screen passwords against lists of dictionary words, known compromised passwords, and common usernames such as “admin” and “root.” Password guidelines should also prevent repetitive or sequential patterns. The organization further recommended a minimum length of eight characters for passwords and advised that accounts be automatically locked after a series of incorrect login attempts. To prevent modern brute-force attacks, the guidelines stated that analysts should use blacklists, secure hashed storage and rate throttling.

“We reviewed a lot of research in the space and determined that composition and expiration did little for security, while absolutely harming user experience. And bad user experience is a vulnerability in our minds,” noted Paul Grassi from NIST, one of the primary authors of the document, according to CSO Online.

The Shifting Password Paradigm

NIST also noted that passwords sent via SMS are easily intercepted. It recommended using other multifactor authentication methods. Additionally, password tables should be hashed with the strongest possible algorithms, the draft said.

With these updated guidelines for access management and authentication, security professionals and individual users are better positioned to take steps to secure their networks and accounts for the foreseeable future — without compromising the user experience.

Listen to the podcast: Lessons from the NIST Cybersecurity Framework

More from Identity & Access

Another category? Why we need ITDR

5 min read - Technologists are understandably suffering from category fatigue. This fatigue can be more pronounced within security than in any other sub-sector of IT. Do the use cases and risks of today warrant identity threat detection and response (ITDR)? To address this question, we work backwards from the vulnerabilities, threats, misconfigurations and attacks that IDTR specializes in providing visibility into. As identity threat detection and response (ITDR) technology evolves, one of the most common queries we get is: “Why do we need…

Access control is going mobile — Is this the way forward?

2 min read - Last year, the highest volume of cyberattacks (30%) started in the same way: a cyber criminal using valid credentials to gain access. Even more concerning, the X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2024 found that this method of attack increased by 71% from 2022. Researchers also discovered a 266% increase in infostealers to obtain credentials to use in an attack. Family members of privileged users are also sometimes victims.“These shifts suggest that threat actors have revalued credentials as a reliable and preferred…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today