April 22, 2016 By David Strom 2 min read

A recent study sponsored by Intel Security called “Internet of Things and the Smart Home” showed just how much people value their personal data. The study was conducted in July 2015 by Vanson Bourne and collected information from 9,000 consumers.

Everyone has their price, and in this survey of consumers in nine different countries, a majority of respondents indicated they might be willing to share their personal data collected from their smart home with companies in exchange for money. Notably, 70 percent agreed companies should give coupons and discounts to customers in return for data about device usage. That is somewhat depressing.

The Personal Data Disconnect

Here is the disconnect: 92 percent of those surveyed were very concerned about their smart home data being hacked by cybercriminals, even though many were looking forward to living in a smart home.

“Security has to be foundational to the Internet of Things, and when done right, it can be an enabler of IoT,” said Steve Grobman, the chief technology officer for Intel Security, in a statement.

That’s the problem: It is rarely done correctly. While the market for smarter home-based devices such as thermostats, security monitors and safety equipment is booming, few consumers have considered the information security aspects of these devices or what personal data they can collect.

Many of these devices have open IP ports or simple default administrative credentials that leave backdoors cybercriminals can easily exploit. Computerworld reported on an HP study that found 10 different IoT-connected home devices such as smart TVs, webcams and baby monitors are full of security vulnerabilities.

While none of the home IoT suppliers have been sued for a cyber break-in, it is only a matter of time. The potential for obtaining personal information from one of these vendors may not be that far behind, especially given how lax many are with cybersecurity.

Making matters worse is that there is a sizable gap between the real and imagined popularity of connected home devices, described in detail in the “Internet of Things and the Smart Home” report.

Securing Smart Buildings

Mashable is just one source that published a series of suggestions that potential home IoT vendors should consider. Some recommendations include:

  • Have clear statements about privacy policies that are easily accessible from your website’s home page.
  • Implement a process to regularly update firmware with the latest security patches and improvements.
  • Require customers to change default passwords upon installation and enforce stronger password policies.
  • Choose default settings that offer more data privacy protection.
  • Have as few open IP ports as necessary.

Obviously IoT isn’t going away, and its lure for more home-related devices is certainly strong. But the right level of information security should be baked into a vendor’s business model — and its products, too.

To learn more watch the on-demand webinar: Securing the Internet of Things

More from Data Protection

3 Strategies to overcome data security challenges in 2024

3 min read - There are over 17 billion internet-connected devices in the world — and experts expect that number will surge to almost 30 billion by 2030.This rapidly growing digital ecosystem makes it increasingly challenging to protect people’s privacy. Attackers only need to be right once to seize databases of personally identifiable information (PII), including payment card information, addresses, phone numbers and Social Security numbers.In addition to the ever-present cybersecurity threats, data security teams must consider the growing list of data compliance laws…

How data residency impacts security and compliance

3 min read - Every piece of your organization’s data is stored in a physical location. Even data stored in a cloud environment lives in a physical location on the virtual server. However, the data may not be in the location you expect, especially if your company uses multiple cloud providers. The data you are trying to protect may be stored literally across the world from where you sit right now or even in multiple locations at the same time. And if you don’t…

From federation to fabric: IAM’s evolution

15 min read - In the modern day, we’ve come to expect that our various applications can share our identity information with one another. Most of our core systems federate seamlessly and bi-directionally. This means that you can quite easily register and log in to a given service with the user account from another service or even invert that process (technically possible, not always advisable). But what is the next step in our evolution towards greater interoperability between our applications, services and systems?Identity and…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today