If you follow basic security best practices and quickly patch software issues as they arise, you may think your network is safe from cyberthreats. But think again.

Although the number of reported software vulnerabilities is growing year to year, it’s hardware vulnerabilities that can be even more difficult to fix and can cause extensive damage to enterprise networks. With attack surfaces growing and cybercriminal tactics becoming more dangerous and sophisticated by the minute, security teams can’t afford to neglect hardware flaws.

Security operations center (SOC) analysts need full visibility into Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) and other sources of vulnerability data to effectively identify, manage and remediate hardware vulnerabilities. Let’s explore some steps you can take to achieve this visibility and plug security gaps before threat actors can exploit them to breach your network.

Assess Your Inventory to Gain Visibility Into Hardware Vulnerabilites

The first step is to understand your infrastructure. Collect key data on your hardware and software, such as central processing unit (CPU) vendor and model, firmware and basic input/output system (BIOS) version, motherboard vendor and model, and a list of connected devices. These attributes will help you understand the potential impact from a highly visible attack like Meltdown or Spectre and build a response plan accordingly.

If hardware is impacted, it may be very difficult to fix the problem. Often the only viable mitigation strategy is to apply a software patch. Hardware issues frequently occur at the chip level and sometimes require collaboration between hardware and software vendors. Therefore, you need a consolidated view into your hardware and software inventory to assess the exposure level of any hardware vulnerability and know which machines already have a software patch applied.

Identify Reliable Sources of Vulnerability Data

Once you know what hardware and software you have deployed, the next step is to correlate the inventory data with reliable sources of vulnerability data. Data normalization is a known challenge during this phase, and you may choose to either build your own solution or invest in a ready-made application programming interface (API) enriched with vulnerability information. But even with automation, manual work is often required to further enrich this vulnerability data with hardware attributes, assess the impact and prioritize the response accordingly.

Fulfill Your SOC Team’s Need for Speed

To mount a worthy fight against the growing number of cyberthreats amid a growing industrywide skills gap, SOC teams need a solution that addresses their need for speed. If you’re ready to step up to the challenge of hardware vulnerability management, it’s time to shift from a reactive to a proactive approach to endpoint security. Improved visibility into your hardware vulnerabilities is the key to taking that next step.

Make Security Analytics More Effective with Deep Insight into Endpoints

More from Intelligence & Analytics

RansomExx Upgrades to Rust

IBM Security X-Force Threat Researchers have discovered a new variant of the RansomExx ransomware that has been rewritten in the Rust programming language, joining a growing trend of ransomware developers switching to the language. Malware written in Rust often benefits from lower AV detection rates (compared to those written in more common languages) and this may have been the primary reason to use the language. For example, the sample analyzed in this report was not detected as malicious in the…

Moving at the Speed of Business — Challenging Our Assumptions About Cybersecurity

The traditional narrative for cybersecurity has been about limited visibility and operational constraints — not business opportunities. These conversations are grounded in various assumptions, such as limited budgets, scarce resources, skills being at a premium, the attack surface growing, and increased complexity. For years, conventional thinking has been that cybersecurity costs a lot, takes a long time, and is more of a cost center than an enabler of growth. In our upcoming paper, Prosper in the Cyber Economy, published by…

Overcoming Distrust in Information Sharing: What More is There to Do?

As cyber threats increase in frequency and intensity worldwide, it has never been more crucial for governments and private organizations to work together to identify, analyze and combat attacks. Yet while the federal government has strongly supported this model of private-public information sharing, the reality is less than impressive. Many companies feel that intel sharing is too one-sided, as businesses share as much threat intel as governments want but receive very little in return. The question is, have government entities…

Tackling Today’s Attacks and Preparing for Tomorrow’s Threats: A Leader in 2022 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SIEM

Get the latest on IBM Security QRadar SIEM, recognized as a Leader in the 2022 Gartner Magic Quadrant. As I talk to security leaders across the globe, four main themes teams constantly struggle to keep up with are: The ever-evolving and increasing threat landscape Access to and retaining skilled security analysts Learning and managing increasingly complex IT environments and subsequent security tooling The ability to act on the insights from their security tools including security information and event management software…