The idea of bad actors stealing valuable assets brings to mind a picture of masked men breaking into a bank vault or museum and making a getaway with their illicit stash. But what if the enemy is one of us — someone who knows exactly where we keep our most valuable items, how we safeguard them and even the alarm code to disable the entire security system?

Distinguishing Malicious Insiders From Legitimate Users

Organizations hold patents, intellectual property, client data and other valuable information, and thousands of employees need access to those assets for legitimate reasons. With so much at stake, it is critical for security teams to be able to identify rogue staffers and determine whether their access credentials have been compromised by an external actor to get on the inside.

But how can security teams distinguish malicious insiders from legitimate users when suspicious activity closely resembles typical behavior? They must model the user’s normal behavior and measure this against subtle characteristic changes and anomalous activity using user behavior analytics (UBA).

Anomalous activity can include a user logging in from a different geographic location, logging in via a virtual private network (VPN) at odd hours, or transferring high volumes of data from the network to an external site or cloud storage account. Any one of these activities by itself does not necessarily indicate malicious intent, but the combination of several suspicious behaviors warrants investigation by a security operations center (SOC) analyst to determine whether the user has gone rogue or had credentials stolen. Each anomalous activity increases the user’s risk score. When it crosses a certain threshold, the user needs to be investigated or closely monitored.

Unlocking the Power of Machine Learning

Rules-based anomaly detection is a great way to identify illicit behaviors, but what if the clues are much more subtle? That’s where machine learning can help.

Let’s take a look at the activities of an employee in the marketing department, for example:

If this employee plans to quit his or her job and is looking to take proprietary data to a rival firm, he or she might exhibit the following behavior:

You’ll notice that the user does not change his or her routine drastically but exhibits certain subtle activity changes that indicate malicious intent.

A UBA solution powered by machine learning uses unsupervised learning to help model a user’s behavior in various categories, such as authentication, network access, firewall activity, application activity, port or network scans, denial-of-service events, malware or other malicious software activity. The user’s risk score is increased based on deviation from the baseline established by the model. The model also identifies deviation from normal activity versus frequency to give you a picture of the user’s risk posture.

Peer group analytics offer yet another lens into a user’s activities to help identify when a user deviates from the typical behavior of employees with similar roles and responsibilities.

Learn More

Learn more about QRadar User Behavior Analytics and try the free QRadar UBA app from the IBM Security App Exchange. You can also watch this video to learn how you can combine QRadar UBA and QRadar Advisor with Watson to investigate suspicious behavior.

If you are attending Think 2018 in Las Vegas, check out the Security and Resiliency Campus and attend these sessions on user behavior analytics:

Watch now! View the Think 2018 Security & Resiliency Sessions on-demand

More from Artificial Intelligence

What should an AI ethics governance framework look like?

4 min read - While the race to achieve generative AI intensifies, the ethical debate surrounding the technology also continues to heat up. And the stakes keep getting higher.As per Gartner, “Organizations are responsible for ensuring that AI projects they develop, deploy or use do not have negative ethical consequences.” Meanwhile, 79% of executives say AI ethics is important to their enterprise-wide AI approach, but less than 25% have operationalized ethics governance principles.AI is also high on the list of United States government concerns.…

GenAI: The next frontier in AI security threats

3 min read - Threat actors aren’t attacking generative AI (GenAI) at scale yet, but these AI security threats are coming. That prediction comes from the 2024 X-Force Threat Intelligence Index. Here’s a review of the threat intelligence types underpinning that report.Cyber criminals are shifting focusIncreased chatter in illicit markets and dark web forums is a sign of interest. X-Force hasn’t seen any AI-engineered campaigns yet. However, cyber criminals are actively exploring the topic. In 2023, X-Force found the terms “AI” and “GPT” mentioned…

How AI can be hacked with prompt injection: NIST report

3 min read - The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) closely observes the AI lifecycle, and for good reason. As AI proliferates, so does the discovery and exploitation of AI cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Prompt injection is one such vulnerability that specifically attacks generative AI. In Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations, NIST defines various adversarial machine learning (AML) tactics and cyberattacks, like prompt injection, and advises users on how to mitigate and manage them. AML tactics extract information…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today