Two recent discoveries by IBM Security X-Force researchers indicate that the U.K. is seeing an increased wave of banking Trojan attacks from two families linked with the Zeus Trojan: Sphinx and Kronos.

In the former case, X-Force researchers are the first to confirm that, beyond observing cybercriminals selling a new Zeus variant dubbed Sphinx on dark web forums, this malware actually exists and is actively attacking banks in the wild.

Sphinx is commercial malware sold to anyone willing to pay for it, which means its targets can vary. The most current identified configuration is targeting several major U.K. banks and one Polish bank. X-Force’s analysis of Sphinx shows it is, for the most part, a replica of Zeus v2 variants.

The second case has to do with the Kronos Trojan. Kronos is a known banking malware threat that emerged in mid-2014. Surprisingly, this malware has gone silent for the past few months and has just reemerged, showing no technical advancements but a change in turf that focuses on U.K. banks and one bank in India.

The U.K. is, and has been for many years, a preferred target for cybercrime because of its prosperous economy and strong adoption of internet-based services for banking and payments. While the U.K. is already the most targeted area for banking Trojan malware configurations (per IBM Trusteer data), the past few months have shown more activity than usual. Banking Trojans such as Shifu, Zeus Sphinx and Kronos are configured to launch into action upon access to consumer, corporate and even wealth management accounts.

This post brings more information about Zeus Sphinx and Kronos, both of which are current threats trending in the global cybercrime arena.

Learn more about Staying ahead of threats with global threat intelligence

Zeus Sphinx — It’s Real

Zeus Sphinx is crimeware that emerged in underground fraud forums in late August 2015, offered for sale by a Russian-speaking vendor for $500 per binary — without a malware builder. This means that Sphinx’s vendor is not enabling fraudsters to independently generate new malware files. Instead, they would have to buy a new variant generated by the vendor every time their current version is detected as malicious by signature-based security solutions.

In a post selling Sphinx to other cybercriminals, its vendor indicated the malware communicates via the anonymizing Tor network, making it harder to sinkhole, avoiding IP address-based blacklisting and evading ZeusTrackers.

Sphinx’s General M.O.

Zeus Sphinx is used for the theft of online banking authentication elements such as user credentials, cookies and certificates. These elements are subsequently used by fraudsters in illicit online transactions typically performed from the user’s own device. Connection to the endpoint is facilitated via backconnect hidden virtual network computing (VNC), which means the infected endpoint will initiate a remote access connection to the criminal’s endpoint. This feature allows the attacker to gain user-grade access to the device even through firewall protection.

In most cases, Sphinx is configured to only harvest username and password combinations from the victim, both in a generic manner and when triggered by the websites users visit. The fraudsters that use this minimal configuration to test attack possibilities may be using the basic authentication or simply selling the harvested data to other criminals.

In some cases, Sphinx was specifically configured to further deploy webinjections with social engineering content designed to lure victims into divulging two-factor authentication (2FA) codes generated by a card reader.

Sphinx-enabled fraudulent transactions typically originate from the victim’s endpoint via VNC connection; this tactic is used to bypass fingerprint-based security features.

Sphinx’s Current Targets

While this Trojan can be sold to anyone — and thus configuration file contents can differ from one another — current variants of Sphinx target banks in the U.K. and Poland, as well as a popular online payments system.

Figure 1: The Zeus Sphinx Trojan’s current targets worldwide.

Technical Details

Additional details from the vendor’s post advertising Zeus Sphinx (originally in Russian) claim it has the following malware features:

  • Form grabber and webinjects for the latest Internet Explorer (IE) and Mozilla versions using the standard Zeus webinjection mechanism;
  • Firefox and Tor browser with cookie grabber and transparent page redirect (webfakes);
  • VNC module that can backconnect to the attacker;
  • SOCKS 4/4a/5 Proxy with UDP and IPv6 support;
  • FTP, POP3 grabber;
  • Certificate grabber;
  • Keylogger.

The vendor’s post was simultaneously found in the underground by a few intelligence analysts, including IBM Security X-Force researchers, but at that time, no security vendor was able to confirm that Zeus Sphinx was real or active in the wild.

This has now officially changed. By mid-September 2015, X-Force researchers found an actual Sphinx sample in the wild and confirmed that Zeus Sphinx not only exists, but is actively attacking online banking customers.

Analysis of the Sphinx variant shows that the malware indeed features the same installation flow as typical Zeus v2 variants, writing itself to the Application Data folder and establishing persistence via Windows\Currentversion\Run. The configuration file is stored in the Windows Registry using randomized file names.

Sphinx captures GET/POST requests by hooking the ntdll!NtDeviceIoControlFile process. Unlike Zeus, this method resembles the Gootkit Trojan’s method of grabbing user credentials on the fly. Sphinx also sports the Zeus PHP botnet classic control panel interface.

When browsing their bank’s website, Sphinx’s webfakes redirection scheme seamlessly sends victims to a phishing page without seeing the URL change. Each client-side bot is designed to deploy with the minimal user privilege level; each user on the same endpoint can be attributed a different bot ID.

The author of the Sphinx variation has made sure to protect botnet communications with a unique encryption key. Traffic is encrypted with a self-signed SSL certificate in the same manner used by malware such as Dyre and Shifu.

Kronos Is Back

Right around the same time that Sphinx materialized and Shifu set its sights on the U.K., the Kronos banking Trojan returned from a hiatus, switching its configuration triggers to a list that distinctly focuses on U.K. banks.

In a rather unusual occurrence, Kronos went silent for the past few months, shutting down the command-and-control servers that communicated with its infected botnets. As of September 2015, this has changed. Someone on the Kronos server side has flipped the lights back on, reconnecting with infected bots and sending them a brand new configuration file — only this time, it is attacking U.K. banks as well as one bank in India.

Stay ahead of threats with global threat intelligence and automated protection

About Kronos

Kronos, banking malware named after the father of Zeus, emerged on underground cybercrime boards in mid-2014, when it was offered for sale by a Russian-speaking vendor to the cybercrime community for a whopping $7,000 USD.

At first, there was no actual proof that the malware was indeed active in the wild, but by July 2014 it was clear that Kronos was primarily attacking banks in France.

Kronos samples analyzed by X-Force researchers in 2014 confirmed that the malware was a user-mode rootkit that could hook popular browsers, featuring the typical Trojan mechanisms designed to facilitate online banking fraud. Some of those features are:

  • Encrypted configuration file with URL targets and webinjections;
  • Form grabbing to steal user credentials on the fly;
  • A Zeus-compatible webinjection mechanism;
  • A VNC module to remotely control infected endpoints;
  • Hefty anti-research and anti-AV features.

New post-hiatus Kronos samples seem to operate in the exact same manner as they did before, indicating that the malware was not retired for development purposes. This is rather logical since Kronos is a commercial offering; it is therefore possible that its current operators are not actual developers who regularly make changes to their code to keep it stealthy over time.

For Kronos, the only behavioral change observed by X-Force is an unexpected crash of the Chrome browser on machines infected with the malware. This issue can stem from a difficulty Kronos may have with injecting into Chrome, making it crash accidentally — or it could be deliberate in order to force infected users to browse via IE or Firefox, where all its webinjections work properly.

Kronos’ Change of Turf

On top of changing its target list to focus on the U.K., Kronos’ new configuration includes more strategic updates, including elaborate webinjection schemes for some of the banks it targets. In new phishing-type injections, Kronos displays completely new web pages to its victims, aiming to harvest their online banking credentials, telephone banking passwords and credit card information. At this time, Kronos is after personal banking accounts, likely spreading via email spam.

Fighting Evolving Threats

Fighting emerging threats like the Zeus Sphinx Trojan or evolving threats like Kronos is easy with malware detection solutions. With protection layers adapted to the ever-changing threat landscape, financial organizations can gain access to a malware intelligence network that provides real-time insight into fraudster techniques and capabilities.

More from Malware

Kronos Malware Reemerges with Increased Functionality

The Evolution of Kronos Malware The Kronos malware is believed to have originated from the leaked source code of the Zeus malware, which was sold on the Russian underground in 2011. Kronos continued to evolve and a new variant of Kronos emerged in 2014 and was reportedly sold on the darknet for approximately $7,000. Kronos is typically used to download other malware and has historically been used by threat actors to deliver different types of malware to victims. After remaining…

A View Into Web(View) Attacks in Android

James Kilner contributed to the technical editing of this blog. Nethanella Messer, Segev Fogel, Or Ben Nun and Liran Tiebloom contributed to the blog. Although in the PC realm it is common to see financial malware used in web attacks to commit fraud, in Android-based financial malware this is a new trend. Traditionally, financial malware in Android uses overlay techniques to steal victims’ credentials. In 2022, IBM Security Trusteer researchers discovered a new trend in financial mobile malware that targets…

RansomExx Upgrades to Rust

IBM Security X-Force Threat Researchers have discovered a new variant of the RansomExx ransomware that has been rewritten in the Rust programming language, joining a growing trend of ransomware developers switching to the language. Malware written in Rust often benefits from lower AV detection rates (compared to those written in more common languages) and this may have been the primary reason to use the language. For example, the sample analyzed in this report was not detected as malicious in the…

Raspberry Robin and Dridex: Two Birds of a Feather

IBM Security Managed Detection and Response (MDR) observations coupled with IBM Security X-Force malware research sheds additional light on the mysterious objectives of the operators behind the Raspberry Robin worm. Based on a comparative analysis between a downloaded Raspberry Robin DLL and a Dridex malware loader, the results show that they are similar in structure and functionality. Thus, IBM Security research draws another link between the Raspberry Robin infections and the Russia-based cybercriminal group 'Evil Corp,' which is the same…