As cybercriminals continue to get better at penetrating systems, it is becoming increasingly clear that companies need to step up and move from a compliance-driven approach to an optimized risk management security program. Since IBM i is often the most critical system, it’s important to monitor all user activities within it properly.

Investigating IBM i

Your best bet to catch the bad guys hiding in the noise is to monitor those transactions with the added context of what is happening outside the IBM i. Those logs should be sent to a security intelligence platform to detect and fully contextualize scenarios such as the very realistic one provided below.

  1. An individual guesses a user password on the IBM i.
  2. The same individual who successfully logged in as a basic user — with sufficient rights to run simple application tasks, but no command line or special authorities — finds a way to gain additional rights using nonconventional methods.
  3. The same user then gains access to the IBM i and steals or changes critical data.

The Challenges

AJLIB is the interface provided as is by IBM for an external system to connect to the IBM i world. From a security information and event management (SIEM) perspective, this interface comes with some important challenges, which for the time being include:

  • AJLIB does not natively support Syslog, only Log file Protocol.
  • The log cycle is fixed at 15 minutes and cannot be changed, so the logs do not reach the SIEM in real time.
  • The system audit journal is the only source available. Other sources of information should be monitored, such as database changes recorded in database journals, activities captured by exit programs, etc.
  • There is no filter available to remove the noise and no option to select the fields that should be included in the logs sent to the SIEM. Due to the sizable amount of data generated by the IBM i, filtering and enriching this information becomes crucial.
  • Customers who tried to use this interface reported several performance challenges.

A Sound Alternative

The good news is that there are excellent alternatives to using AJLIB that can help overcome those challenges. One of them is Cilasoft’s security and compliance software solutions for IBM i environments. Cilasoft’s QJRN/400 enriches and filters audit data generated by the IBM i. The data set it produces allows you to focus on what really matters.

A combined QJRN/400 and IBM QRadar solution improves security, boosts security operations center (SOC) efficiency and productivity, and delivers value within hours, not weeks or months.

IBM Security QRadar is the world’s leading security intelligence platform because it has the right foundation and integrations to help clients turn a pile of point solutions into a finely tuned prevention, detection and response system that protects against advanced threats. QRadar consolidates all security information, including the prefiltered and enriched events generated by Cilasoft’s QJRN/400, into a single, web-based user interface using a customizable dashboard approach designed to pinpoint a client’s top threats, attacks, risks and vulnerabilities.

Additional Information

Interested in getting more info about IBM i? You can:

Attention IBM Business Partners: Sign in now to view a demo of IBM i

More from Data Protection

How to craft a comprehensive data cleanliness policy

3 min read - Practicing good data hygiene is critical for today’s businesses. With everything from operational efficiency to cybersecurity readiness relying on the integrity of stored data, having confidence in your organization’s data cleanliness policy is essential.But what does this involve, and how can you ensure your data cleanliness policy checks the right boxes? Luckily, there are practical steps you can follow to ensure data accuracy while mitigating the security and compliance risks that come with poor data hygiene.Understanding the 6 dimensions of…

Third-party access: The overlooked risk to your data protection plan

3 min read - A recent IBM Cost of a Data Breach report reveals a startling statistic: Only 42% of companies discover breaches through their own security teams. This highlights a significant blind spot, especially when it comes to external partners and vendors. The financial stakes are steep. On average, a data breach affecting multiple environments costs a whopping $4.88 million. A major breach at a telecommunications provider in January 2023 served as a stark reminder of the risks associated with third-party relationships. In…

Communication platforms play a major role in data breach risks

4 min read - Every online activity or task brings at least some level of cybersecurity risk, but some have more risk than others. Kiteworks Sensitive Content Communications Report found that this is especially true when it comes to using communication tools.When it comes to cybersecurity, communicating means more than just talking to another person; it includes any activity where you are transferring data from one point online to another. Companies use a wide range of different types of tools to communicate, including email,…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today