April 17, 2015 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Joining a host of other high-profile companies, Dropbox has just announced a new bug bounty partnership with reporting platform HackerOne. Security researchers can sniff out bugs and bring them to light before they’re maliciously exploited, and while other find-and-report schemes typically have a maximum payout, the Dropbox bounty offers a ground floor of $216. Are there big bucks here for bug trackers?

What’s Covered?

According to Kaspersky Lab, the new Dropbox program covers more than just Dropbox Core SDK. Bounties are also paid out on the Dropbox and Carousel iOS, Android and Web apps, in addition to the desktop client. There are some bugs outside the purview of the rewards program, such as those related to password, email or account policies, as well as to cross-site scripting bugs or those that require physical access to execute.

Still, there is massive potential payoff here for dedicated bug finders. The official Dropbox blog notes it has paid out $10,475 in a single day and almost $5,000 for a single bounty. Standard rules apply: Whoever reports the bug first gets the money, and public disclosure before the Dropbox team has time to address the issue results in disqualification. Also of note is that the company is paying contributors who identified bugs before the Dropbox bounty program started.

Necessary Payouts

As noted in a new research paper from HackerOne, bug bounty programs do not have an effect on the zero-day market, helping to spur a race between malicious actors and defensive researchers for vulnerabilities. While companies can’t provide the same kind of six-figure payouts offered by attackers, some monetary incentive can help “maximize the discovery correlation and dry up the offensive stockpile,” according to Dr. Michael Siegel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This is the beauty of bounty programs: Many hands make light work, and when combined with automated tools, it is possible for companies to leverage smaller payouts and still defend their software.

For Dropbox, this is key since more attacks target the company’s offerings as it gains ground. For example, the IBM X-Force Application Security Research Team recently found a flaw in Dropbox SDK for Android (CVE-2014-8889) that let attackers connect mobile apps to users’ Dropbox accounts without their permission or knowledge. Additionally, in October 2014, hundreds of Dropbox passwords were made public, and while the company says it wasn’t hacked, it has clearly become a target regardless of the point of origin.

Using a bounty program makes sense. It is now common industry practice and pushes the good guys to find and report bugs as quickly as possible. By skipping the ceiling for payouts and offering rewards for “particularly interesting bugs in other Dropbox applications” not on the approved short list, the storage company is hoping to tap full-bore effort without paying for any more full-time equivalents. In other words, paying up front may well prove more cost-effective than hiring more staff and should help keep Dropbox out of the firing line when it comes to new zero-day attacks.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today