October 14, 2014 By Jaikumar Vijayan 2 min read

On Friday, Kmart became the latest in a string of major U.S. retailers to announce that cyberattackers had gained access to customer credit and debit card data after breaking into its point-of-sale (POS) network.

This breach is similar to those announced by Home Depot, Dairy Queen, SuperValu, UPS and several others in recent months. It is sure to heighten concerns about the continued vulnerability of U.S. payment system networks to cyberattacks nearly one year after a massive intrusion at Target exposed cardholder and other data belonging to over 100 million people.

In a prepared statement, Kmart’s parent company, Sears Holdings, said the intrusion appears to have occurred in early September. However, it remained undetected by Kmart’s information technology team until last Thursday. According to Sears, the cybercriminals infected Kmart’s store payment data systems with a form of malware that was untraceable by current antivirus software tools.

The attackers obtained certain customer credit and debit card data, but no debit card PINs, email addresses or Social Security numbers were compromised in the incident, Sears said. The number of Kmart store locations or customers that may have been affected by the breach was not disclosed, and no information is yet available on how the attackers gained access to Kmart’s POS network. The company joins a rapidly growing list of retailers that have been victimized by sophisticated POS system attacks in recent months.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Secret Service warned retailers of a data-stealing malware tool named Backoff that is being widely used by cybercriminals to steal data from POS systems. According to the two agencies, Backoff has infected systems belonging to at least 1,000 U.S. businesses, though some believe the actual number may be much greater.

Seven POS system vendors have confirmed that they have had multiple clients affected by Backoff. In many cases, the attackers have taken advantage of popular remote access tools such as Microsoft’s Remote Desktop, Chrome Remote Desktop and LogMeIn to gain access to privileged user accounts, which they have then used to extract cardholder data.

Kmart has not yet disclosed the nature of the malware that was used in the attack against its POS network, so it’s unclear whether the retailer was a victim of Backoff. Among the recent victims, only Dairy Queen identified the data-stealing malware as Backoff; however, given the earlier government warnings, it is highly likely that at least some of the others that have disclosed breaches so far are also victims of Backoff.

What’s worse, considering that at least 1,000 U.S. businesses have been hit by the malware, it’s a near certainty that several more retailers could announce similar breaches in the coming months.

Image Source: Flickr

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today