January 14, 2015 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Many cybercriminals try to break into corporate networks by guessing passwords, but a recently discovered malware dubbed Skeleton Key may let them simply make up one of their own.

A post from Dell SecureWorks Counter Threat Unit provided details on the threat, which is specific to Microsoft’s Active Directory service. It was described as an in-memory patch that lets cybercriminals compromise a system that only uses single-factor authentication for things such as Web-based email or virtual private networks. Worse, users may still log in with their original passwords even as cybercriminals access their data.

As an article on ZDNet explains, Skeleton Key is particularly worrisome because it could let cybercriminals pose as legitimate users inside an organization. Given that so many IT security problems are traced to insiders or former staff members, this could make it more difficult to trace those who have stolen information via the malware after the fact.

Forbes published an account of how this malware may have first popped up at a company based in London. Apparently, those using it would employ simple yet specific aliases for those they were attacking. The malware could be dated back to almost three years ago.

On the other hand, anyone attempting to use Skeleton Key will need to start over again once someone with an infected ad server shuts it down and activates it again, The Register noted. He or she will also need a password that governs domain administration, but if this is available in any physical areas of the organization — such as an IT department cubicle — it is possible that cybercriminals could try the same trick multiple times.

Some chief information security officers believe they are already well-protected by intrusion detection systems and the like, but as Dark Reading pointed out, Skeleton Key doesn’t create network traffic, so these types of products won’t help. And if cybercriminals were to impersonate someone from human resources or the senior management team, there might already be an authorization in place to access the information of various personnel. This means IT departments might not be quick to raise any questions or concerns.

If nothing else, Skeleton Key might be a good conversation-starter about the need for multifactor (or at least two-factor) authentication. This could include a physical hardware token, Computer Business Review suggested, or perhaps a soft token deployed on a smartphone. Otherwise, the only way to know whether your organization has been affected by this malware is to conduct a thorough information audit.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today