November 18, 2014 By Jaikumar Vijayan 3 min read

The United States continues to host more malware and botnets than any other country, including Russia and China, which are often viewed as the biggest sources for cybercrime campaigns worldwide.

According to IBM’s latest X-Force Threat Intelligence Quarterly, roughly one-quarter of all command-and-control (C&C) servers that are used to control botnets globally and more than 40 percent of sites serving malware are hosted in the U.S.

The number of sites hosted in the U.S. serving malware is nearly four times greater than second-place China, which hosts around 11 percent of all malicious links worldwide, and about five times greater than Germany, which is in third place with 8.3 percent.

These statistics are a sobering reminder that more malware attacks originate closer to home than originally assumed. However, they do not tell the whole story on malware and botnets.

Malware and Botnets in the US

When the number of malicious sites and servers in a country are considered as a percentage of the total number of IP-addressable systems in that country, the U.S. drops dramatically down the list of the top nations for hosting malware.

In fact, it doesn’t even show up on the list of the top 20 offenders for hosting malware and botnets. When the numbers are normalized, Hong Kong emerges as the leader for hosting malicious sites, with a somewhat startling infection rate of 11 percent of all installed systems. It is followed by Lithuania and Bulgaria, with about a 10 percent contamination rate each.

Similarly, the U.S. drops out of the list of top nations for hosting C&C servers when the number of malicious systems is taken as a percentage of all installed systems in the country. Lithuania tops the list of nations hosting the largest number of C&Cs, followed by a slew of Eastern European nations, including Belarus, Slovakia and the Ukraine.

What the raw numbers do not indicate is whether the sites and servers hosting malicious content were set up for that specific purpose or whether they were legitimate sites that were compromised, the IBM report noted.

X-Force Threat Intelligence Quarterly

IBM’s X-Force Threat Intelligence report provides a quarterly overview of the major security trends for the preceding three months.

The statistics in the report provide an important indicator of the threats enterprises face from malicious systems hosted in other countries, according to Chris Poulin, research strategist at IBM and one of the authors of the report.

One of the goals of the quarterly threat intelligence report is to arm enterprises with information about what they should look for on the threat landscape, he said.

“For example, if you look at where command-and-control servers are located, one of the things organizations can do is start creating correlation rules that look for access to those particular countries,” he said.

The reason why the United States has consistently topped the list of countries hosting malware sites is simply because it also has the largest base of installed systems, Poulin said. Therefore, instead of looking at just the raw, absolute numbers, IBM decided to look at the percentage of the total number of systems in a particular country, he said. This approach shows that a disproportionately large number of malicious sites and servers are hosted in Eastern Europe.

IBM’s report is the latest to highlight the global scope of malware attacks these days. Earlier this year, researchers at security vendor FireEye identified C&C servers hosted in as many as 206 countries worldwide. That number was notably higher than the 184 countries where such servers were located just one year ago.

On average, enterprises are attacked once every 1.5 seconds by malware hosted on such systems, FireEye noted in its report.

More from

Unpacking the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

4 min read - The NIST cybersecurity framework (CSF) helps organizations improve risk management using common language that focuses on business drivers to enhance cybersecurity.NIST CSF 1.0 was released in February 2014, and version 1.1 in April 2018. In February 2024, NIST released its newest CSF iteration: 2.0. The journey to CSF 2.0 began with a request for information (RFI) in February 2022. Over the next two years, NIST engaged the cybersecurity community through analysis, workshops, comments and draft revision to refine existing standards…

What should Security Operations teams take away from the IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index?

3 min read - The IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index has been released. The headlines are in and among them are the fact that a global identity crisis is emerging. X-Force noted a 71% increase year-to-year in attacks using valid credentials.In this blog post, I’ll explore three cybersecurity recommendations from the Threat Intelligence Index, and define a checklist your Security Operations Center (SOC) should consider as you help your organization manage identity risk.The report identified six action items:Remove identity silosReduce the risk of…

Obtaining security clearance: Hurdles and requirements

3 min read - As security moves closer to the top of the operational priority list for private and public organizations, needing to obtain a security clearance for jobs is more commonplace. Security clearance is a prerequisite for a wide range of roles, especially those related to national security and defense.Obtaining that clearance, however, is far from simple. The process often involves scrutinizing one’s background, financial history and even personal character. Let’s briefly explore some of the hurdles, expectations and requirements of obtaining a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today