The cybercrime business seems to be growing more profitable each day, with continuous innovation and organized underground forums allowing cybercriminals to share, trade and collaborate. As a result, financial institutions often feel outnumbered and overwhelmed.

One of the greatest challenges banks face is gaining visibility into the ever-evolving threat landscape. It’s more important than ever to stay ahead of growing threats by accessing global threat intelligence and leveraging an automated threat protection service.

The Cybercrime Challenge

In the past decade, cybercriminals have quickly adapted to most security controls deployed by banks. Financial institutions introduce a new, sophisticated security control, and cybercriminals develop creative methods to bypass them. When cybercriminals invent ways to bypass these security measures, banks further tighten controls or deploy a new control to address the gap, which starts this cycle all over again.

The main victim in this continuous cycle is the bank customer. While the bank absorbs the cost of the new controls, customers have the burden to comply. This can translate into delayed transactions, or a customer could even be locked out of accounts. Security and fraud teams also have to adapt to the new controls and are still responsible for investigating each fraud alert, which costs time and money. The repercussions are significant, with negative impacts to internal costs and customer experience.

A Dynamic, Adaptable Approach

Staying ahead in today’s advancing landscape demands an automated threat protection service that is both dynamic and adaptable. It requires three core capabilities:

  1. Global threat intelligence that discovers new threats around the world as they begin to develop;
  2. Dedicated research and development teams that can make sense of new threats and marketplace changes and quickly identify protections as needed;
  3. Adaptable technology that is dynamic and can easily be updated — without impacting the bank or customers.

Staying Ahead of Threats

Staying ahead of fraud and other types of cybercrime requires relevant threat intelligence and adaptable solutions. The more threat intelligence you have, the more effective your organization can be against cybercriminals. And the more dynamic your security solutions, the faster you can block new threats.

Read the white paper: Making a business case for fraud-prevention technology

More from Banking & Finance

Exploring DORA: How to manage ICT incidents and minimize cyber threat risks

3 min read - As cybersecurity breaches continue to rise globally, institutions handling sensitive information are particularly vulnerable. In 2024, the average cost of a data breach in the financial sector reached $6.08 million, making it the second hardest hit after healthcare, according to IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach report. This underscores the need for robust IT security regulations in critical sectors.More than just a defensive measure, compliance with security regulations helps organizations reduce risk, strengthen operational resilience and enhance customer trust.…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

PixPirate: The Brazilian financial malware you can’t see

10 min read - Malicious software always aims to stay hidden, making itself invisible so the victims can’t detect it. The constantly mutating PixPirate malware has taken that strategy to a new extreme. PixPirate is a sophisticated financial remote access trojan (RAT) malware that heavily utilizes anti-research techniques. This malware’s infection vector is based on two malicious apps: a downloader and a droppee. Operating together, these two apps communicate with each other to execute the fraud. So far, IBM Trusteer researchers have observed this…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today