December 30, 2015 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Chris Vickery, the white-hat hacker who recently gained attention for exposing public-facing and hence easily accessible databases has now found something even worse: A database with the personal data of 191 million voters that is misconfigured to allow public access. What should the public know?

What Personal Data Is Exposed?

The political database contains over 300 gigabytes of information in total. The exposed personal data in the database includes full names, addresses, voter IDs, genders, phone numbers, dates of birth, political affiliation and voter history for millions of registered voters.

SecurityWeek reported that Vickery and others have searched the database for their own records to check the validity. They found the details stored in it were accurate.

Whose Database Is It?

But there is a larger problem here: Nobody will admit to actually owning the database. SecurityWeek noted that Vickery has been assisted by fellow researchers at DataBreaches.net as well as Steve Ragan of CSO Online in trying to identify the owner responsible for the database.

The researchers have contacted a congressman’s political action committee and several political data firms, including Political Data, L2 Political, Aristotle, NGP VAN and Catalist, to try to identify the owner. So far, the team isn’t any closer to an answer, and the database is still online.

Could NationBuilder Be the Culprit?

SecurityWeek reported that NationBuilder, a tool often used for political campaigns, is currently the main suspect. Ragan noted that NationBuilder had said the IP address hosting the database wasn’t one of its own, and it wasn’t an IP address for any of their hosted clients.

“While the database is not ours, it is possible that some of the information it contains may have come from data we make available for free to campaigns. From what we’ve seen, the voter information included is already publicly available from each state government, so no new or private information was released in this database,” NationBuilder founder and CEO Jim Gilliam said in a statement to SecurityWeek.

However, Ragan believes that based on the voter count and the format of the records, the database is from one of NationBuilder’s 2014 updates. It seems that the voterID field is a clear marker to the source — but there’s still no confirmation.

Until more information is discovered, registered voters should be wary of any suspicious communications received, especially if they’re political in nature.

More from

The major hardware flaw in Apple M-series chips

3 min read - The “need for speed” is having a negative impact on many Mac users right now.The Apple M-series chips, which are designed to deliver more consistent and faster performance than the Intel processors used in the past, have a vulnerability that can expose cryptographic keys, leading an attacker to reveal encrypted data. This critical security flaw, known as GoFetch, exploits a vulnerability found in the M-chips data memory-dependent prefetcher (DMP).DMP’s benefits and vulnerabilitiesDMP predicts memory addresses that the code is most…

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today