March 28, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Symantec recently noted on its blog that it has seen a disturbing trend in malware attacks: the use of stolen SHA-2 certificates to make the malware appear valid.

SHA-1 Is Insecure

This change in the certs used by the malware is part of an evolving strategy because of security concerns about SHA-1. The malware wants the infected system to believe it is valid code. If the system does, there is a higher probability that the malware will be executed without detection.

Microsoft has already announced the discontinuation of support for files digitally signed with a SHA-1 signature after Jan. 1, 2016, in certain scenarios. Malware creators responded to this by adding stolen SHA-2 certificates to the SHA-1 certificates they may be using.

Symantec described how an older banking Trojan, Trojan.Carberp.B, has been modified to use this approach. The vector used for infection is usually the poisoned attachment embedded in an email document, which has “ATTN 00890” as its subject. The email and the attachment use language targeting people who work in accounting departments.

The infected attachment contains a malicious macro that uses a ROT13 +13/-13 cipher. The macro causes the download of a malicious signed binary, sexit.exe, from a server hosted in Mauritius. Sexit.exe is then installed and completes the infiltration.

SHA-2 Could Have Its Own Problems

Researchers found that sexit.exe was signed by two certificates: One is SHA-1-based, the other SHA-2-based. The goal of using both is to escape detection by the operating system. The use of a SHA-1 cert alone might not be accepted by newer OSs, but the SHA-2 certificate alone would not be accepted by older systems, such as those prior to Windows XP SP3.

There is an additional benefit to malware creators using a SHA-2 certificate: The SHA-2 cert can provide backup if the primary SHA-1 certificate is discovered to be bogus and revoked by the signing authority.

The rise of this technique shows how malware creators are adapting to the new certificate rules. This threat won’t show up immediately in your organization since the creators need to be able to target legacy systems, but it will be coming.

More from

What does resilience in the cyber world look like in 2025 and beyond?

6 min read -  Back in 2021, we ran a series called “A Journey in Organizational Resilience.” These issues of this series remain applicable today and, in many cases, are more important than ever, given the rapid changes of the last few years. But the term "resilience" can be difficult to define, and when we define it, we may limit its scope, missing the big picture.In the age of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI), the prevalence of breach data from infostealers and the near-constant…

Airplane cybersecurity: Past, present, future

4 min read - With most aviation processes now digitized, airlines and the aviation industry as a whole must prioritize cybersecurity. If a cyber criminal launches an attack that affects a system involved in aviation — either an airline’s system or a third-party vendor — the entire process, from safety to passenger comfort, may be impacted.To improve security in the aviation industry, the FAA recently proposed new rules to tighten cybersecurity on airplanes. These rules would “protect the equipment, systems and networks of transport…

Protecting your digital assets from non-human identity attacks

4 min read - Untethered data accessibility and workflow automation are now foundational elements of most digital infrastructures. With the right applications and protocols in place, businesses no longer need to feel restricted by their lack of manpower or technical capabilities — machines are now filling those gaps.The use of non-human identities (NHIs) to power business-critical applications — especially those used in cloud computing environments or when facilitating service-to-service connections — has opened the doors for seamless operational efficiency. Unfortunately, these doors aren’t the…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today