March 2, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

This week, New York released cybersecurity regulations that monitor required infrastructure for regulated financial services institutions. Though the regulations have been in development for a while, CSO Online reported they were only finalized about a month ago.

A Much-Needed Initiative

The regulations include mandating the establishment of a cybersecurity program within financial institutions. Each companywide program must have an appointed chief information security officer (CISO). The CISO is held responsible for the operation of the program, which is to be run on a risk-assessment model.

This means that decision-making is based on an evaluation of the various risks that present themselves and the process that leads to a decision can be transparently demonstrated to a regulator. Also, the cybersecurity of any business partners must now be entered into the overall risk assessment.

The regulations can get technique-specific. For instance, an annual penetration test will be a criterion, and vulnerability assessments are to be performed twice a year, at minimum. Also, the definition of nonpublic information expands in the regulations to more than what is usually considered confidential. Organizations will have to prove that nonpublic information is protected by cybersecurity efforts.

Increasing Cybersecurity Regulations

The next six months will be a period of transition under the regulations. Richard Santalesa, of the Smartedge Law Group, outlined the deadlines that the regulations mandate in an email.

“The deadline for compliance with many of the Regulations requirements is Sept. 1, 2017, while compliance with the more technical requirements is either March 1, 2018 or Sept. 1, 2018. And the requirements to be imposed upon third-party service providers is now March 1, 2019,” he wrote. “Together the staggered and extended deadlines for compliance should provide entities with a modicum of breathing room to employ requirement measures, procedures and policies.”

Many institutions are now facing some needed efforts in compliance resolution, even though professional organizations have recommended the risk-assessment approach be used in cybersecurity for many years.

Santalesa went on to list what will be expected of financial services institutions. He said they “have six months to review the requirements, update their cybersecurity policy, incident response plan, craft a third-party service provider policy, conduct and document a risk assessment.” Then, by Sept. 1, 2017, those organizations must submit a certification of compliance or exemption.

These New York regulations may end up serving as a model for adoption by other states. Additionally, the effort made to comply with this governance may actually serve an institution well in other jurisdictions, which can lower the overall cost of compliance.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today