May 1, 2019 By David Bisson 2 min read

A distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) botnet targeting servers used by the Electrum bitcoin wallet reached 152,000 infected hosts at the end of April.

Malwarebytes began tracking this DDoS botnet and its attacks against Electrum’s infrastructure in the spring of 2019. On April 24, the number of infected machines serving the botnet numbered just below 100,000. The next day, its bot count reached 152,000. This total then fluctuated before settling back down to around 100,000 compromised machines.

According to Malwarebytes’ analysis, the majority of these infected computers are located in the Asia Pacific region. Meanwhile, most of the bots found in the Americas were located in Peru and Brazil.

Earlier in April, Malwarebytes observed attackers using two campaigns to drop ElectrumDoSMiner, the malware that is helping to fuel this botnet. One of those operations involved the RIG exploit kit, while the other used the Smoke Loader malware downloader. Even so, the security firm’s more recent report revealed that threat actors are also now using a previously undocumented loader called Trojan.BeamWinHTTP to help distribute ElectrumDoSMiner.

Putting the Electrum Attacks Into Context

This DDoS botnet is part of an ongoing assault against owners of Electrum bitcoin wallets. As reported by ZDNet, the siege began back in December 2018 when bad actors tricked users into installing a malicious wallet update by exploiting a flaw in Electrum’s software. Attackers then used this fake fix to steal more than 200 bitcoin from affected users in the matter of a week. In total, these actors have stolen the bitcoin equivalent of approximately $4.6 million as of Malwarebytes’ latest report.

In February, Electrum’s developers fought back by exploiting the same flaw to redirect users to install a patched version of the Electrum software. It was this move that likely prompted attackers to retaliate by launching the botnet and targeting Electrum’s servers, as Malwarebytes posited in its mid-April article. These DDoS attacks effectively overwhelmed Electrum’s legitimate nodes so that users had no choice but to connect to the malicious ones.

How to Defend Against a DDoS Botnet

Security professionals can help their organizations defend against a DDoS botnet by creating a secure perimeter around their cloud infrastructure. This perimeter should consist of next-generation firewalls, DDoS traffic scrubbing and anomaly detection. Security teams should also consider enlisting the help of artificial intelligence to improve their organization’s anti-malware defenses and their own effectiveness.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today