April 11, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Dridex malware has been used in the past to steal financial information from users in a sophisticated manner. But Buguroo security researchers found that the malware itself was vulnerable to attacks, and this revelation led to more information about how dangerous it actually is.

How the Vulnerability Works

Dridex has been developed by the cybercrime group Evil Corp. The Trojan launches when a poisonous Office macro attached to a spam email gets clicked. Usually purporting to be an invoice, the malware spam then uses local DNS poisoning to launch a redirection attack.

This kind of attack employs replica sites that substitute for the intended destination, which are then used to collect personal and banking information. Since the user never touches the intended destination, that legitimate site will not know an attack has occurred.

Analyzing the JavaScript code responsible for stealing banking credentials allowed the researchers to determine the URL of a command-and-control (C&C) panel that was used by the malware’s operators. That represented a treasure trove of information for researchers.

“Using this information, in addition to the information obtained from our JavaScript analysis and searching the Intel Big Data from Buguroo Labs, we noticed some coincidences between this panel and others we already had detected in the past,” Buguroo said in its report.

“Looking deeply into the panel responses, we found that this panel version was vulnerable, and we were able to recover part of the compromised information.”

What Research Shows About Dridex

The recovered information included account numbers, names, last login dates, credit card numbers, card types and information on the issuing bank and country of origin. SecurityWeek noted that European and English-speaking countries were still the main targets, but they also found credit cards related to African and Latin American companies.

The researchers also estimated that the global cost of Dridex was around $20 million after just a 10-week period, assuming 1 out of 10 stolen credit cards can be used by the attackers and considering the $500 average of stolen money per account.

Buguroo further concluded that the Dridex malware is being used by different cybercriminal groups — not necessarily the developers of the first Dridex versions. It came to this conclusion because of the “exceedingly rare vulnerability of a C&C server to a basic attack,” which implies the current operators are not as sophisticated as the original developers.

This could mean that the Dridex mechanism was sold on the black market to others. These other cybercriminals may not be as technologically adept as the originators, hence the C&C vulnerability.

More from

Government cybersecurity in 2025: Former Principal Deputy National Cyber Director weighs in

4 min read - As 2024 comes to an end, it’s time to look ahead to the state of public cybersecurity in 2025.The good news is this: Cybersecurity will be an ongoing concern for the government regardless of the party in power, as many current cybersecurity initiatives are bipartisan. But what will government cybersecurity look like in 2025?Will the country be better off than they are today? What are the positive signs that could signal a good year for national cybersecurity? And what threats should…

FYSA – Adobe Cold Fusion Path Traversal Vulnerability

2 min read - Summary Adobe has released a security bulletin (APSB24-107) addressing an arbitrary file system read vulnerability in ColdFusion, a web application server. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2024-53961, can be exploited to read arbitrary files on the system, potentially leading to unauthorized access and data exposure. Threat Topography Threat Type: Arbitrary File System Read Industries Impacted: Technology, Software, and Web Development Geolocation: Global Environment Impact: Web servers running ColdFusion 2021 and 2023 are vulnerable Overview X-Force Incident Command is monitoring the disclosure…

2024 trends: Were they accurate?

4 min read - The new year always kicks off with a flood of prediction articles; then, 12 months later, our newsfeed is filled with wrap-up articles. But we are often left to wonder if experts got it right in January about how the year would unfold. As we close out 2024, let’s take a moment to go back and see if the crystal balls were working about how the year would play out in cybersecurity.Here are five trends that were often predicted for…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today