February 28, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

In January, security researchers reported that MongoDB servers had sustained disastrous wave of attacks. Now, analysts from GuardiCore believe they have discovered a similar campaign affecting MySQL databases.

MySQL Database Goes the Way of MongoDB

Though these particular MongoDB databases may have either been badly configured or not configured at all to be public-facing, the January strike was still a new and virulent kind of attack. Eventually, it spread to an estimated 30,000 databases. The ransomware in question demanded 0.2 bitcoin for victims to recover their data.

SecurityWeek reported that the same sort of ransomware spread to attack ElasticSearch clusters, Hadoop and CloudDB databases. Worse, the attackers might simply delete the stolen data rather than return it, even if the ransom is paid. Researchers also found that multiple actors compete within the same database to have the most current ransom note and thus receive payment.

How the Attack Works

A more detailed account of the attack was posted on GuardiCore’s blog. The security firm reported that cybercriminals first search for servers that are secured with weak passwords. Then they try to brute-force these servers to gain a foothold, followed by elevated access. Once in all the way, the actors replace the database contents with their own table, which includes a ransom note.

The threat actors appeared to use many of the same techniques in this campaign as they did in January’s MongoDB attacks. Their multiple overwriting method, in particular, has proven to be extremely destructive. Additionally, GuardiCore said it found no evidence of data dumps or data exfiltration during any of the MySQL attacks they monitored, which means the attackers made no attempt to save prior data.

Looking for Low-Hanging Fruit

Mitigation comes, in this case, from using strong passwords and mandatory authentication for any internet-facing systems. Brute-force is a rather inefficient attack method, and cybercriminals who employ this technique are almost always looking for low-hanging fruit.

Users and organizations can vastly improve their security postures by conducting simple password audits and following basic online security best practices.

More from

We are moving!

< 1 min read - SecurityIntelligence.com is being sunset, but have no fear!We have a new home for all of your favorite security and X-Force content.Follow us to www.ibm.com/think to maintain access to the stories and news you love, both new and old.Security Intelligence will officially sunset on Friday, March 28, 2025. To access the latest security thought leadership, go here. To access the latest X-Force research, go here.If you are experiencing cybersecurity issues or an incident, contact X-Force® to help:US hotline: 1-888-241-9812 | Global hotline:…

Bypassing Windows Defender Application Control with Loki C2

10 min read - Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) is a security solution that restricts execution to trusted software. Since it is classified as a security boundary, Microsoft offers bug bounty payouts for qualifying bypasses, making it an active and competitive field of research.Typical outcomes of a WDAC bypass bug bounty submission:Bypass is fixed; possible bounty awardedBypass is not fixed but instead "mitigated" by being added to the WDAC recommended block list. Likely no bounty awarded but honorable mention is typically givenBypass is not…

FYSA — VMware Critical Vulnerabilities Patched

< 1 min read - SummaryBroadcom has released a security bulletin, VMSA-2025-0004, addressing and remediating three vulnerabilities that, if exploited, could lead to system compromise. Products affected include vCenter Server, vRealize Operations Manager, and vCloud Director.Threat TopographyThreat Type: Critical VulnerabilitiesIndustry: VirtualizationGeolocation: GlobalOverviewX-Force Incident Command is monitoring activity surrounding Broadcom’s Security Bulletin (VMSA-2025-0004) for three potentially critical vulnerabilities in VMware products. These vulnerabilities, identified as CVE-2025-22224, CVE-2025-22225, and CVE-2025-22226, have reportedly been exploited in attacks. X-Force has not been able to validate those claims. The vulnerabilities…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today