Over the past two years, businesses have focused on changing how they work. However, these pandemic changes required a high level of IT support and resources. This often causes deficits in other areas, such as the strength to stop a supply chain attack.

The CyberArk 2022 Identity Security Threat Landscape Report found that 79% of cybersecurity workers surveyed felt that cybersecurity took a backseat to operations and these new digital initiatives. The report surveyed 1,750 IT workers at companies with more than 500 employees located in the U.S., UK, France, Germany, Japan, Italy, Spain, Brazil, Mexico, Israel, Singapore and Australia. One in four of the respondents was a C suite executive and 94% work at a manager level or higher.  

Cybersecurity Debt Putting Businesses at Risk

Udi Mokady, founder, chairman and CEO of CyberArk, says that digital transformation spending has skyrocketed.

“The combination of an expanding attack surface, rising numbers of identities and behind-the-curve investment in cybersecurity ⁠— what we call cybersecurity debt ⁠— is exposing organizations to even greater risk, which is already elevated by ransomware threats and vulnerabilities across the software supply chain,” Mokady said. “This threat environment requires a security-first approach to protecting identities, one capable of outpacing attacker innovation.”

Cybersecurity workers named hybrid working as the biggest risk factor in their jobs (86%). Bringing in new digital services for customers or citizens and increased outsourcing of remote vendors and suppliers tied for second with 84% of respondents. Each of these added new human and machine identities.

Can You Stop a Supply Chain Attack? 

One of the biggest surprises: 64% of respondents could not stop an attack from a compromised software supplier. At the same time, 71% of organizations were victims of software supply chain attacks, resulting in data loss or asset compromise. The risk of such an attack is very high for businesses of all sizes. The energy and utility industry was at very high risk, with 88% of respondents reporting a successful attack.

The solution? You may want to require a bill of materials for all software deployments. This reduces the risk of malicious files being included in the download. This also increases visibility into open-source components of the software, which often are high-risk. Most of the respondents to the survey felt that a bill of materials would reduce the risk of software deployments.

Zero Trust for a Strong Defense

One of the biggest takeaways of the report is that zero trust is the best path forward, with almost 100% of respondents at some point on the zero trust maturity curve. Many organizations started their zero trust approach with the principle of least privilege. Some 54% used this principle or plan to use it.

About half of the respondents reported they made an effort to add identity security tools, such as workload (52%), identity security (50%) and data security (45%). In addition, 28% use just-in-time access controls. These only allow access for the amount of time required to complete the task.

The report concludes that businesses and agencies should start by pinpointing high-risk areas in a ‘pay-off plan’. Then, they can create a timeline to remove any more cybersecurity debt. And that’s a timeline to a more secure future. 

More from News

The White House on Quantum Encryption and IoT Labels

A recent White House Fact Sheet outlined the current and future U.S. cybersecurity priorities. While most of the topics covered were in line with expectations, others drew more attention. The emphasis on critical infrastructure protection is clearly a top national priority. However, the plan is to create a labeling system for IoT devices, identifying the ones with the highest cybersecurity standards. Few expected that news. The topic of quantum-resistant encryption reveals that such concerns may become a reality sooner than…

Malware-as-a-Service Flaunts Its Tally of Users and Victims

As time passes, the security landscape keeps getting stranger and scarier. How long did the “not if, but when” mentality towards cyberattacks last — a few years, maybe? Now, security pros think in terms of how often will their organization be attacked and at what cost. Or they consider how the difference between legitimate Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) brands and Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS) gangs keeps getting blurrier. MaaS operators provide web-based services, slick UX, tiered subscriptions, newsletters and Telegram channels that keep users…

New Survey Shows Burnout May Lead to Attrition

For many organizations and the cybersecurity industry as a whole, improving retention and reducing the skills gap is a top priority. Mimecast’s The State of Ransomware Readiness 2022: Reducing the Personal and Business Cost points to another growing concern — burnout that leads to attrition. Without skilled employees, organizations cannot protect their data and infrastructure from increasing cybersecurity attacks. According to Mimecast’s report, 77% of cybersecurity leaders say the number of cyberattacks against their company has increased or stayed the…

Alleged FBI Database Breach Exposes Agents and InfraGard

Recently the feds suffered a big hack, not once, but twice. First, the FBI-run InfraGard program suffered a breach. InfraGard aims to strengthen partnerships with the private sector to share information about cyber and physical threats. That organization experienced a major breach in early December, according to a KrebsOnSecurity report. Allegedly, the InfraGard database — containing contact information of over 80,000 members — appeared up for sale on a cyber crime forum. Also, the hackers have reportedly been communicating with…