December 17, 2015 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

In its “McAfee Labs Threat Report” from November 2015, the security firm found that that macro malware — the big threat of the 1990s — is making a comeback. Researchers from Intel Security noted on Dark Reading that there were four times as many instances of this threat in 2015 compared to last year.

What Is Macro Malware?

Macros are instructions used by some applications, notably Microsoft Word, to get a certain result. In an earlier time, Word executed macros right from the get-go without checking with the user by default. This was a boon for cybercriminals, who could have malicious programs executed immediately upon download. Microsoft has since disabled this behavior, and macros now cannot run without the user’s permission.

The threat was dormant for years, but macro use has recently regained popularity as an infection vector. And it’s not just Word that’s vulnerable these days: Excel files, in which data and associated macros are contained in the same workbook, are also open to such an attack.

The compromised files, which may delivered as email attachments, such as in the Melissa macro attack, often behave normally even after performing their malicious activity. This makes infections even more difficult to detect.

What Happens During an Infection?

A user who enables macros and ignores any warnings that the program may give allows the malware to run after downloading a document. After executing the macro malware, the malware drops one or more .bat, .vbs or .ps files onto the victim’s system, depending upon whether the malware family is Bartallex, Dridex, Donoff or some other downloader. These dropped files will download even more malware such as Upatre, Vawtrak, Chanitor or ZBot.

As the malware runs, an XMLHTTP object is created to exchange data with the server. It continuously sends a connection request to the server using HTTP Send() until it gets a response. Once the connection is established with the decrypted URL, the final payload is downloaded and saved in the specified path on the victim’s machine. Finally, the downloaded binary is executed using the Shell() command.

Attackers usually try to obfuscate macro code via functions ranging from character conversion to complex customized encryption. A huge amount of junk data may resolve itself to one URL in this way.

What Can Be Done?

Simple steps can be used to prevent becoming a victim — most notably not enabling macros. Make sure the default setting for macro security on all Microsoft Office products is set to high.

Iamwire recommended users configure anti-malware software to automatically scan all email and instant message attachments. Make sure email programs do not automatically open attachments or render graphics. Use great caution when opening these attachments, especially when those attachments carry the .doc or .xls extension.

Monitor for unexpected pings to IP addresses such as 1.3.1.2 or 2.2.1.1, etc. from internal computers. This can be an indication of infection.

And as always, beware of spam-based phishing schemes. Don’t click on links in emails from mysterious senders, and ensure all security measures are enabled in your account.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today