November 1, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

First organized in 2005, The CA/Browser Forum is a voluntary group of certification authorities (CAs), vendors of internet browser software and suppliers of other applications that use X.509 v.3 digital certificates for SSL/TLS and code signing. In other words, it’s an industry group focused on certificates.

The Forum was a logical place for Ryan Sleevi of Google to announce that as of October 2017, the Chrome browser would implement Certificate Transparency (CT) as a mandatory feature.

What Is Certificate Transparency?

CT is an open-source framework designed by Google. It is used for monitoring and auditing the domain certificates sites use to establish authenticity with browsers. First proposed in 2013, Certificate Transparency is now an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) open standard, Threatpost reported.

Google thinks the use of CT will aid the trusted online community. “The use of Certificate Transparency has profoundly altered how browsers, site owners and relying parties are able to detect and respond to misissuance and, importantly, gives new tools to mitigate the damage caused when a CA no longer complies with community expectations and browser programs,” Sleevi said on the forum.

Push Toward Mass Adoption

At its heart, CT is a way to reign in CAs that go off the tracks. This happens frequently: Within the past year, Symantec publicly issued certificates that were supposedly for internal use only and a major Chinese CA was also caught issuing untrustworthy certificates to unknown sites. Malware actors could use these certificates in inappropriate and untrustworthy ways.

Google knows it can’t push the entire population toward standardization and mass adoption of CT all by itself, but it can impose the technology on Chrome users. Since Chrome has an overall market share near 60 percent, just doing that will have a great effect.

Google invited security researchers to come forward with any issues related to CT in the next three months to allow time for solutions to be implemented.

Resistance to CT

There may be deeper problems regarding CT. Bruce Morton, director of certificate services with EnTrust, told Threatpost that some have expressed hesitation about registering all external and internal domain names in one publicly accessible repository. He argued that many companies would rather keep this information private.

It remains to be seen if Google can get the industry to rally around CT as a standard way of doing business.

More from

What we can learn from the best collegiate cyber defenders

3 min read - This year marked the 19th season of the National Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition (NCCDC). For those unfamiliar, CCDC is a competition that puts student teams in charge of managing IT for a fictitious company as the network is undergoing a fundamental transformation. This year the challenge involved a common scenario: a merger. Ten finalist teams were tasked with managing IT infrastructure during this migrational period and, as an added bonus, the networks were simultaneously attacked by a group of red…

A spotlight on Akira ransomware from X-Force Incident Response and Threat Intelligence

7 min read - This article was made possible thanks to contributions from Aaron Gdanski.IBM X-Force Incident Response and Threat Intelligence teams have investigated several Akira ransomware attacks since this threat actor group emerged in March 2023. This blog will share X-Force’s unique perspective on Akira gained while observing the threat actors behind this ransomware, including commands used to deploy the ransomware, active exploitation of CVE-2023-20269 and analysis of the ransomware binary.The Akira ransomware group has gained notoriety in the current cybersecurity landscape, underscored…

New proposed federal data privacy law suggests big changes

3 min read - After years of work and unsuccessful attempts at legislation, a draft of a federal data privacy law was recently released. The United States House Committee on Energy and Commerce released the American Privacy Rights Act on April 7, 2024. Several issues stood in the way of passing legislation in the past, such as whether states could issue tougher rules and if individuals could sue companies for privacy violations. With the American Privacy Rights Act of 2024, the U.S. government established…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today