As a cybersecurity writer, I’m more aware than the average person of the security risks with any connected device. So when I sat in my new car for the first time and saw all the different ways it linked to my phone or my home WiFi, more than a few red flags went up. I know that as cars get smarter, they become more susceptible to hackers who are searching for any potential vulnerability. One of the most recently announced attack vectors is the key fob for recent model Honda vehicles.

Vehicle Vulnerabilities

Most IoT or smart devices were never designed with cybersecurity in mind, but vehicles take that lack of security to a higher level, with piecemeal technologies developed by third-party companies. The same risks found in any connected device are found in a smart car. Threat actors have the opportunity to do almost anything, from stealing personal data to manipulating any of the different systems and sensors in the vehicle. But the most popular attack vector, at least for now, is the wireless key fob.

Tesla cars have made news recently due to several different key-fob-related exploits. For example, a teenager found a vulnerability in an app that controls some basic functions like unlocking the vehicles or flashing the headlights. Meanwhile, a European researcher discovered Tesla’s near field communication (NFC) card that’s used like a key fob can easily be exploited by hackers, all because Tesla provides a 130-second window between unlocking the car and starting the engine.

While Tesla vulnerabilities may get high-profile attention, key fob vulnerabilities are found in vehicles more commonly found in public parking lots, in neighborhood driveways and as part of corporate vehicle fleets.

Rolling-PWN

The key fob attack impacting Honda vehicles is known as the Rolling-PWN. Rolling codes are used to avoid replay attacks, which are man-in-the-middle attacks that are intercepted and re-transmitted as if they are authentic codes. The attack exploits a vulnerability in authentication code transmitted wirelessly between the fob and the vehicle. Whenever the fob button is pressed, there is an increase in rolling codes that are synchronizing. Honda vehicles don’t need the exact codes — instead, the rolling codes fall into a window of codes.

“By sending the commands in a consecutive sequence to the Honda vehicles, it will be resynchronizing the counter. Once [the] counter resynced, commands from the previous cycle of the counter worked again. Therefore, those commands can be used later to unlock the car at will,” according to GitHub.

Even though this vulnerability became news over the summer of 2022, the vulnerability was found in 2012 Honda cars and should be assumed to affect every Honda on the market today.  Whoever has access to these codes has permanent access to unlock the car doors and possibly start the vehicle.
Today, Rolling-PWN appears to only target Honda vehicles, but, like any type of cyberattack, expect any system that uses this type of rolling code technology to be at risk.

Problem of Encryption

Key fobs have evolved over the past two decades beyond when their primary purpose was to unlock doors. Depending on the brand and model of the vehicle, the fob offers controls for almost everything – opening windows, remotely starting the engine and defrosting the windshield, just for starters. Many fobs are connected with a smartphone app.

Although the fobs are encrypted, they tend to use symmetric encryption or a single key used by both the device sending the message and the device receiving it. The problem with symmetric encryption is that it can be easily intercepted.

Asymmetric encryption, which uses both a public and a private key, is a much more secure method of code transmission. But as Alan Grau explained in an Electronic Design article, “it can easily use 100X more CPU cycles than symmetric encryption.” It’s too much for systems to handle in a timely manner, so manufacturers default to symmetric encryption and take the risk of the codes being intercepted.

Keeping Vehicles Safe

Company-owned vehicles aren’t usually under the oversight of CIOs and CISOs, but as more smart vehicles enter the corporate fleet, the cyber risks need to be addressed. While a CISO can’t change the type of encryption used on a key fob, they can take steps to protect the vehicles from cyberattacks.

Specifically for Rolling-PWN, GitHub stated, “the recommended mitigation strategy is to upgrade the vulnerable BCM firmware through Over-the-Air (OTA) Updates if feasible.” Currently, Honda is not conducting a recall on their cars or key fobs to remediate the vulnerability.

Beyond that, smart cars need to be addressed just as any other connected computer system. That includes following basic security practices, such as regular software updates on both the vehicle and any devices connected to the vehicle. That includes WiFi. And because cars need regular maintenance and repairs, only trusted third parties should be allowed access to the vehicle and its hardware. Including – and maybe especially – the key fobs.

More from Risk Management

Worms of Wisdom: How WannaCry Shapes Cybersecurity Today

WannaCry wasn't a particularly complex or innovative ransomware attack. What made it unique, however, was its rapid spread. Using the EternalBlue exploit, malware could quickly move from device to device, leveraging a flaw in the Microsoft Windows Server Message Block (SMB) protocol. As a result, when the WannaCry "ransomworm" hit networks in 2017, it expanded to wreak havoc on high-profile systems worldwide. While the discovery of a "kill switch" in the code blunted the spread of the attack and newly…

Why Operational Technology Security Cannot Be Avoided

Operational technology (OT) includes any hardware and software that directly monitors and controls industrial equipment and all its assets, processes and events to detect or initiate a change. Yet despite occupying a critical role in a large number of essential industries, OT security is also uniquely vulnerable to attack. From power grids to nuclear plants, attacks on OT systems have caused devastating work interruptions and physical damage in industries across the globe. In fact, cyberattacks with OT targets have substantially…

Resilient Companies Have a Disaster Recovery Plan

Historically, disaster recovery (DR) planning focused on protection against unlikely events such as fires, floods and natural disasters. Some companies mistakenly view DR as an insurance policy for which the likelihood of a claim is low. With the current financial and economic pressures, cutting or underfunding DR planning is a tempting prospect for many organizations. That impulse could be costly. Unfortunately, many companies have adopted newer technology delivery models without DR in mind, such as Cloud Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)…

Tech Stack Diversity: Security Benefits and Costs

If your remit protects the information technology estate, you might be tired of the constant fire drills and reminders of upcoming disruptions. The barrage from cybersecurity vendors claiming "we have the solution" is almost equally exhausting. Start here: there is no magic bullet cybersecurity solution. If there was, its inventor would be a gazillionaire and have a list of enemies miles long. However, well-stacked solutions can significantly reduce your risk posture. The key is to place dependability over dependence, reduce…