Chip card technology, also known as chip-and-PIN, chip-and-sign or EMV technology, is quickly becoming the global payment standard. According to Payments Leader, 40 percent of cards issued worldwide and 70 percent of point-of-sale (POS) terminals use EMV. However, American banks and merchants are just starting to make the switch, with an October 2015 deadline looming for businesses to implement chip-capable technology. But how do chip cards really work? What are the benefits? More importantly, are there any drawbacks?

The New Chip Card Standard

American consumers are familiar with swipe credit card technology, in which card data is statically encoded on a magnetic stripe (magstripe) that is then run through POS systems. Typically, users must supply their swipe card and PIN or their card and a signature. The problem? Data on these cards can be easily copied using inexpensive reader machines, allowing criminals to duplicate credit and debit cards. To address this issue, Europay, MasterCard and Visa (EMV) developed a new standard: chip cards.

So what are they? As noted by Chase Paymentech, these cards come with an embedded micro computer chip and magstripe. The chip must be inserted into a compatible POS machine, at which time it is dynamically authenticated. First, the card is checked to ensure it is activated and hasn’t expired. Then, a set of unpredictable numbers is generated to encrypt the transmission of card data to the relevant financial institution. The bank or credit card company then authenticates the transaction and sends back an encrypted approval. The biggest benefit of chip cards is reduced fraud, since chips are much harder to duplicate and it is impossible to manually enter card numbers or use carbon-copy paper alternatives.

Half Measures?

In an effort to align with global POS technologies and improve security, MasterCard and Visa have set an October 2015 deadline for what they term a “liability shift,” according to the Wall Street Journal. Both companies are putting their full support behind EMV technology in the United States, and as of this fall, they will shift liability for fraud to whichever party — merchant or financial institution — uses less secure technology. Thus, if merchants have chip capabilities but banks don’t issue chip cards, banks bear the cost. If merchants choose swipe-and-sign chip cards, they’re liable if fraud occurs. The idea here is to compel both banks and retailers to adopt chip cards at the same time and significantly reduce total credit card fraud.

However, as discussed by GeekWire, there is a loophole. While chip cards fall under the new rules, the choice to go chip-and-PIN or chip-and-sign is left up to merchants. Mike Cook, assistant treasurer of Wal-Mart, put it bluntly when he said, “The fact that we didn’t go to PIN is such a joke.” Why? Because signatures are much easier to fake than PINs since they’re rarely checked for accuracy. This means a chip card is no defense in the case of a lost or stolen wallet since criminals could simply insert the chip, scribble a signature and be on their way.

Risky Business

There are also concerns that chip card technology may not be entirely secure and cannot completely eliminate fraud. In the United Kingdom, for example, EMV was fully adopted in 2006. Counterfeit card fraud is down significantly, but card-not-present fraud, which occurs during online or telephone transactions, is on the rise.

According to The Hacker News, chip cards also have several inherent vulnerabilities. First, researchers have been able to predict the pattern of supposedly unpredictable numbers, allowing them to duplicate chip cards and eliminate the ability of banks to detect fraudulent transactions. Security researchers also found a way to perform man-in-the-middle attacks on chip cards by compromising the subprocess, which determines the authentication required by a POS terminal. The result is the ability to bypass PIN or signature requirements altogether. Finally, Wired reports that a British team found flaws in some “contactless” Visa chip cards, which allowed the approval of foreign currency transactions up to $999,999.99

Card Blanche?

What’s the bottom line for EMV? Is this technology the new way forward, or do companies need to start from scratch? As evidenced by success in Europe, opting for chip-and-PIN cards can significantly reduce the amount of counterfeit card fraud and limit the chances of fraud in the case of lost or stolen cards. However, the technology isn’t perfect. Chip-and-signature is a less secure form, and several card-level vulnerabilities have been identified. However, big credit players are throwing their weight behind the chip card standard — like it or loathe it, liability shifts in October.

More from Banking & Finance

Kronos Malware Reemerges with Increased Functionality

The Evolution of Kronos Malware The Kronos malware is believed to have originated from the leaked source code of the Zeus malware, which was sold on the Russian underground in 2011. Kronos continued to evolve and a new variant of Kronos emerged in 2014 and was reportedly sold on the darknet for approximately $7,000. Kronos is typically used to download other malware and has historically been used by threat actors to deliver different types of malware to victims. After remaining…

Why Cybersecurity Risk Assessment Matters in the Banking Industry

When customers put money in a bank, they need to trust it will stay there. Because of the high stakes involved for the customer, such as financial loss, and how long it takes to resolve fraud and potential identity theft, customers are sensitive to the security of the bank as well as fraud prevention measures. Banks that experience high volumes of fraud are likely to lose customers and revenue. The key is to protect customers and their accounts before problems…

Cost of a Data Breach: Banking and Finance

The importance of cybersecurity has touched almost every industry. Beyond that, robust cybersecurity is table stakes for several sectors, particularly health care and the banking and finance industry. Not only is financial data at risk, but so is customer trust. In banking and finance, trust means everything. Yet, consumers are hesitant to share their confidential data. A recent McKinsey survey revealed that no industry achieved a trust rating of 50% for data protection. Here’s the most sobering stat: 87% of…

What Do Financial Institutions Need to Know About the SEC’s Proposed Cybersecurity Rules?

On March 9, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a new set of proposed rules for cybersecurity risk management, strategy and incident disclosure for public companies. One intent of the rule changes is to provide “consistent, comparable and decision-useful” information to investors. Not yet adopted, these new rules – published in the Federal Register on March 23 – could change reporting requirements. Take a look at some of the big-ticket items and what your organization needs to know.…