October 5, 2020 By David Bisson 2 min read

Malicious actors launched the first publicly observed attack campaign where they successfully flew under the radar of Apple’s notarization mechanism to target macOS users with Apple malware — in this case, OSX.Shlayer.

Inside the Attack Campaign

The attack campaign attracted the attention of the security community on Aug. 28, 2020, according to Objective-See.

College student and security researcher Peter Dantini noticed that when a user visited homebrew[dot]sh, a fake domain impersonating the Homebrew missing package manager for macOS and Linux, the campaign displayed a prompt for the user to install an Adobe Flash Player update after carrying them through several redirects.

In the event the user clicked the update, the campaign implemented various commands via bash to install an OSX.Shlayer payload on the victim’s computer. This threat then proceeded to install various adware payloads onto the infected machine.

Where Apple Notarization Mechanism Came In

The campaign described above wasn’t unusual at face value. It’s not the first time malicious actors used a fake Adobe Flash Player update to prey upon macOS users. It also wasn’t the first time OSX.Shlayer showed up in a digital attack.

On the contrary, OSX.Shlayer is a regular player in the Apple malware threat landscape. It’s been masquerading as an Adobe Flash Player update since Intego first spotted it in February 2018. A year later, Carbon Black’s Threat Analysis Unit (TAU) came across some new samples of the malware disguised as Adobe Flash update software. Many of those samples’ Apple Disk Images (DMGs) contained the signature of a real Apple developer and used legitimate system applications to target users of macOS versions 10.10.5 to 10.14.3.

OSX.Shlayer kept going into 2020. After being named by Kaspersky as the “most common threat on the macOS platform” in 2019, OSX.Shlayer attracted the attention of Intego in June 2020 by spreading through malicious Google search results. Some months later, SentinelOne uncovered ZShlayer, a new variant of the well-known macOS threat.

What set this threat apart was that its adware payloads were notarized by Apple. As explained on Apple’s website, the tech giant uses notarization as a means to automatically scan software for malicious content. This process helps to protect users against Apple malware and assuage their fears when running software they’ve downloaded from the Internet.

In this campaign, the malicious actors managed to get their payloads notarized via the spctl command. This enabled the payloads to run on a macOS computer without raising users’ fears.

Objective-See reported the issue to Apple on Aug. 28, 2020, and revoked the developer code-signing certificates used to sign the payloads. However, the campaign was still live, serving up new notarized payloads, on Aug. 30, 2020.

How to Defend Against Apple Malware Like OSX.Shlayer

Organizations can protect themselves against crafty malware, such as OSX.Shlayer, by largely following best practices that can help keep them safe from ransomware. They should begin by building a security-aware culture that uses ongoing awareness training to educate their employees about social engineering techniques, including the use of Adobe Flash Player malware, to target them. They also should use technical controls as part of an endpoint detection and response (EDR) strategy. These security measures will help them to monitor for suspicious activity on their endpoints and lead to Apple malware removal.

Finally, organizations need to make sure they have insight into some of the latest attack campaigns. The only way they can do that is by maintaining streams of threat intelligence on which their security teams can draw.

More from

Hive0137 and AI-supplemented malware distribution

12 min read - IBM X-Force tracks dozens of threat actor groups. One group in particular, tracked by X-Force as Hive0137, has been a highly active malware distributor since at least October 2023. Nominated by X-Force as having the “Most Complex Infection Chain” in a campaign in 2023, Hive0137 campaigns deliver DarkGate, NetSupport, T34-Loader and Pikabot malware payloads, some of which are likely used for initial access in ransomware attacks. The crypters used in the infection chains also suggest a close relationship with former…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today