Just when you think it’s safe to go back in the water, it hits!

Cisco recently disclosed a vulnerability alert. You might think, “This happens all the time. What’s one more vulnerability? How bad could it be?” Well in this case, it might just rival Heartbleed and Shellshock.

According to the Cisco ASA alert, this vulnerability, which was discovered by Exodus Intelligence, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of the affected system or remotely execute code. The reason this is such a critical vulnerability is because the devices affected are Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASAs), or firewalls — the very devices that many companies see as their first — and, for some, only — line of defense.

In response to the Cisco cisco-sa-20160210-asa-ike advisory, the IBM X-Force team has raised the global threat level to AlertCon 2 and will continue to actively assess the situation. Our threat research team has already caught wind of reconnaissance being done that could be the bad guys looking for potential targets.

Although at the time of disclosure the Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) was not aware of any active exploitation, details on how to develop exploit code for vulnerable ASA devices have already been made public. Current speculation is that this specific vulnerability might even be wormable.

The vulnerability can be triggered by UDP packets sent to the device and are caused by the lack of mitigation techniques such as address space layout randomization (ASLR) and Data Execution Prevention (DEP). This allows attackers to know exact offsets in memory and enables instructions stored in data segments to be executed.

Note that only traffic directed to the affected system can be used to exploit this vulnerability. This vulnerability affects systems configured in routed firewall mode only or in single or multiple context mode, and it can be triggered by IPv4 and IPv6 traffic.

To determine if your device is vulnerable, you can reference the list provided via the Cisco alert or run the following to check the running cryptomaps:

> ciscoasa# show running-config crypto map | include interface

If a cryptomap is returned, the device is vulnerable and you need to patch. We encourage all those affected to fire up emergency change window procedures and patch this vulnerability immediately. There is currently no workaround.

More from

Emotional Blowback: Dealing With Post-Incident Stress

Cyberattacks are on the rise as adversaries find new ways of creating chaos and increasing profits. Attacks evolve constantly and often involve real-world consequences. The growing criminal Software-as-a-Service enterprise puts ready-made tools in the hands of threat actors who can use them against the software supply chain and other critical systems. And then there's the threat of nation-state attacks, with major incidents reported every month and no sign of them slowing. Amidst these growing concerns, cybersecurity professionals continue to report…

RansomExx Upgrades to Rust

IBM Security X-Force Threat Researchers have discovered a new variant of the RansomExx ransomware that has been rewritten in the Rust programming language, joining a growing trend of ransomware developers switching to the language. Malware written in Rust often benefits from lower AV detection rates (compared to those written in more common languages) and this may have been the primary reason to use the language. For example, the sample analyzed in this report was not detected as malicious in the…

Why Operational Technology Security Cannot Be Avoided

Operational technology (OT) includes any hardware and software that directly monitors and controls industrial equipment and all its assets, processes and events to detect or initiate a change. Yet despite occupying a critical role in a large number of essential industries, OT security is also uniquely vulnerable to attack. From power grids to nuclear plants, attacks on OT systems have caused devastating work interruptions and physical damage in industries across the globe. In fact, cyberattacks with OT targets have substantially…

Resilient Companies Have a Disaster Recovery Plan

Historically, disaster recovery (DR) planning focused on protection against unlikely events such as fires, floods and natural disasters. Some companies mistakenly view DR as an insurance policy for which the likelihood of a claim is low. With the current financial and economic pressures, cutting or underfunding DR planning is a tempting prospect for many organizations. That impulse could be costly. Unfortunately, many companies have adopted newer technology delivery models without DR in mind, such as Cloud Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)…