October 22, 2015 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Email spam is a problem. While overall numbers have been dropping, Securelist reported that in Q2 2015, more than 50 percent of all email traffic came from spammers. What’s more, malicious actors have changed tactics to focus on the next generation of tech-savvy consumers: Rather than looking for bank details or personal information, new phishing emails target social connections while malware-carrying attachments are camouflaged to look like antivirus or OS updates. But advancements in detection, particularly the DMARC protocol, have the potential to send spam packing.

Spam Has an Easy Way In

As noted by CSO Online, one of the easiest ways for attackers to convince victims their emails are genuine is by spoofing the sender address. If users believe the message really is from Microsoft, their antivirus company or a trusted friend, they’re far more likely to open, read and even download an attachment. And once attackers have access to a user’s system, they can both send emails from an infected account and use contact list data to spoof a whole new set of addresses.

While early spam-detection efforts focused on message content or relied on users to self-identify bad emails, attackers have quickly graduated to a new level of sophistication by lifting company logos, including working phone numbers and generally brushing up on their grammar. The result? Fake and legitimate messages look and sound almost identical.

DMARC-ation

Fortunately, Google and Yahoo have a plan: the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance (DMARC) protocol. According to Threatpost, DMARC takes a hard line against email spoofing by checking all messages against both Domain Keys Identified Mail (DKIM) and Sender Policy Framework (SPF) validation systems.

DKIM relies on a wrapped cryptographic signature to verify the sender domain, while SPF lets senders specify which hosts are able to carry their messages, making spoofed emails easy to identify. In combination, the DMARC protocol makes it almost impossible for spam to slip through — if both the DKIM and SPF checks aren’t successful, the message is quarantined.

Under the new DMARC system, senders can provide information to recipients on what they can do if legitimate emails aren’t getting through, while recipients can send feedback to senders letting them know why their messages were flagged. Yahoo is set to implement the protocol for its ymail.com and rocketmail.com services by Nov. 2, 2015, while Google says it’s moving to a “strict” DMARC policy by June of next year.

While it’s unlikely that even DMARC can completely eliminate spam, it’s a step in the right direction; make spoofing messages hard enough for attackers and they’ll start looking somewhere else. Even with DMARC up and running, however, users can’t get overconfident: Better safe than spoofed.

More from

Hive0137 and AI-supplemented malware distribution

12 min read - IBM X-Force tracks dozens of threat actor groups. One group in particular, tracked by X-Force as Hive0137, has been a highly active malware distributor since at least October 2023. Nominated by X-Force as having the “Most Complex Infection Chain” in a campaign in 2023, Hive0137 campaigns deliver DarkGate, NetSupport, T34-Loader and Pikabot malware payloads, some of which are likely used for initial access in ransomware attacks. The crypters used in the infection chains also suggest a close relationship with former…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today