October 25, 2018 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Threat actors targeted political and diplomatic officials in Central Asia with a Windows Trojan designed to upload and download files, take screenshots, and dig into other personal data on infected machines.

Researchers attributed the attacks to a threat group called DustSquad. The malware is dubbed Octopus based on the 0ct0pus3.php script found on one of its former command-and-control (C&C) servers.

Victims were lured to download the Windows Trojan by activating what they thought was a version of Telegram, a popular messaging app. Social engineering is the most likely method of distribution; according to the researchers, Telegram faced a potential ban in Kazakhstan, which might have encouraged users to download it while it was still available.

How Does Octopus Infiltrate Networks?

The phony Telegram app doesn’t actually work, which suggests that the malware was created in haste, the researchers noted. After some initial connection checks, Octopus attaches itself to the network module and develops a hash of system data that acts as a sort of digital fingerprint to keep track of its victim as it executes various commands and steals information.

Octopus has some unusual features, including its use of the Delphi programming language. It also takes advantage of the Indy Project to run JSON and relay data to its C&C server and compresses the data with TurboPower Abbrevia.

The researchers reported that some of the same victims that had been infected with the Windows Trojan were also hit with other attacks, including DroppingElephant, Zebrocy and StrongPity. The campaign in question may go as far back as four years.

A Little Phishing Protection Goes a Long Way

While DustSquad may be going after a fairly specific group of victims, its use of the Octopus malware is similar to the ways in which a Windows Trojan can be aimed at organizations anywhere. It also shows how difficult it can be to keep up with changes in phishing tactics. A communications app like Telegram, for instance, wouldn’t even have existed a few years ago.

Security experts recommend investing in advanced phishing tools to continuously examine possible risks as they emerge and respond when malware gains persistence on a system. Security teams should also monitor their environment for the indicators of compromise (IoCs) listed in the IBM X-Force Exchange threat advisory.

Source: Kaspersky Lab

More from

Unified endpoint management for purpose-based devices

4 min read - As purpose-built devices become increasingly common, the challenges associated with their unique management and security needs are becoming clear. What are purpose-built devices? Most fall under the category of rugged IoT devices typically used outside of an office environment and which often run on a different operating system than typical office devices. Examples include ruggedized tablets and smartphones, handheld scanners and kiosks. Many different industries are utilizing purpose-built devices, including travel and transportation, retail, warehouse and distribution, manufacturing (including automotive)…

Stealthy WailingCrab Malware misuses MQTT Messaging Protocol

14 min read - This article was made possible thanks to the hard work of writer Charlotte Hammond and contributions from Ole Villadsen and Kat Metrick. IBM X-Force researchers have been tracking developments to the WailingCrab malware family, in particular, those relating to its C2 communication mechanisms, which include misusing the Internet-of-Things (IoT) messaging protocol MQTT. WailingCrab, also known as WikiLoader, is a sophisticated, multi-component malware delivered almost exclusively by an initial access broker that X-Force tracks as Hive0133, which overlaps with TA544. WailingCrab…

Operationalize cyber risk quantification for smart security

4 min read - Organizations constantly face new tactics from cyber criminals who aim to compromise their most valuable assets. Yet despite evolving techniques, many security leaders still rely on subjective terms, such as low, medium and high, to communicate and manage cyber risk. These vague terms do not convey the necessary detail or insight to produce actionable outcomes that accurately identify, measure, manage and communicate cyber risks. As a result, executives and board members remain uninformed and ill-prepared to manage organizational risk effectively.…

Pentesting vs. Pentesting as a Service: Which is better?

5 min read - In today's quickly evolving cybersecurity landscape, organizations constantly seek the most effective ways to secure their digital assets. Penetration testing (pentesting) has emerged as a leading solution for identifying potential system vulnerabilities while closing security gaps that can lead to an attack. At the same time, a newer entrant into the security arena is Pentesting as a Service (PTaaS). Although PTaaS shares some similarities with pentesting, distinct differences make them two separate solutions. This article will discuss how these methodologies…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today