January 16, 2017 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Hackers are the bad guys, right? Depends on the perspective. With law enforcement agencies and governments worldwide now turning to mobile phone hacking providers, public backlash is on the rise. Who’s to say hacking tools are always used in the public interest?

According to Motherboard, one fed-up, anonymous actor decided to take matters into his or her own hands by breaching phone hack company Cellebrite and grabbing 900 GB of data, some of which may contain evidence of the company dealing with less-than-ethical authoritarian regimes.

Open Sesame

Cellebrite’s main offering is a laptop-sized device known as the Universal Forensic Extraction Device (UFED), which can grab SMS messages, emails, call logs and other data from virtually any type of mobile phone. The hardware is a big draw for both nefarious actors and law enforcement agencies.

The company said its customers have no reason to worry about the most recent breach, since the compromised information came from “a legacy database backup of my.Cellebrite, the company’s end user license management system.” The firm isn’t denying the hack, however, acknowledging that 900 GB of mobile phone hacking data had indeed been lifted.

Mobile Phone Hacking Is the New Normal

Cellebrite sees itself as a legitimate provider of forensics tools that aid government agencies in investigations. According to BGR, the company is actively involved in developing the so-called Textalyser, which would potentially allow law enforcement to determine whether drivers were texting immediately before an accident.

From a gray-hat hacker’s perspective, however, companies like Cellebrite amount to little more than well-paid attackers who make their money breaching the public trust. And while there’s no guarantee the same actors were involved, this breach bears similarities to the 2015 Hacking Team breach and the 2014 attack on Gamma International, which makes webcam and email intrusion software.

Turning the Tables

In an email to Motherboard, which received the 900 GB exclusively, the anonymous actor said that “had it not been for the recent stance taken by Western governments, no one would have known but us.” Motherboard hasn’t made the data public and the actor seems to have no plans to do so, meaning that Cellebrite may escape unscathed by public ire.

Still, it’s a wake-up call for companies that provide any type of mobile phone hacking or intrusion software. Government contracts and widespread use don’t equate to lack of scrutiny. Cybercriminals are watching, waiting and, if pushed, may decide to turn the tables and publish critical records for public consumption.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today