Security breaches aren’t cheap. A recent Ponemon Institute report noted that the average consolidated total cost of a breach hit $4 million in 2016, while the cost per report reached $158. Meanwhile, a new study from Kaspersky Lab that took an in-depth look at the cost of a security incident for both SMBs and enterprise organizations. Simply put, time and money conspire to make this an expensive problem to solve.

The Cost of a Security Incident: Going Up!

There’s a big difference between the cost of data breaches for SMBs and those of enterprises. On average, the recovery total is $86,500 for small companies and almost 10 times that amount — $861,000 — for enterprises. Digging deeper, the study found that allocating IT staff time to handle the mitigation and aftermath of a breach was the single largest cost borne by both small and large businesses.

The time to detection also played a role. While breaches still cost $28,000 for SMBs and $105,000 for big business when instantly detected, a lag time of even seven days bumped up the cost of a security incident to $105,000 and $393,000, respectively. It makes sense: The longer malicious actors have access to a system undetected, the more damage they can do and the more time IT professionals need to clean up the mess.

The report also noted that many SMBs and enterprises are now spending on security to help mitigate threats. Small businesses are shelling out an average 18 percent of their budgets on security, and enterprises are allocating 21 percent to implement solid security measures.

Problems persist, however, since security spending doesn’t always correlate with lower breach costs. Both zero-day and targeted attacks can potentially bypass even solid network security. It’s also worth noting some differences between SMB and corporate attacks. Cybercriminals prefer to target small businesses on mobile, while enterprises suffer more hacktivist attacks.

Tangible Takeaways?

With the cost of a security incident on the rise for both small and large organizations, what’s the next step for companies? As noted by eWeek, there are several steps that can help reduce the impact.

First up is better employee training. Not only does staff awareness of potential attack vectors, such as phishing or social media scams, help reduce attack potential, but the Ponemon study also found that training lowered the cost of a data breach by $9 per record.

There are other ways to save on security incidents, such as securing solid C-suite buy in. If executives can be convinced of the need for agile security before a breach occurs, the result is minimal spending upfront and bigger savings over time.

It’s also worth taking a long view of the security landscape. The Kaspersky data suggested that throwing money at the problem won’t guarantee success. Instead, companies need to find a balance between security spending and day-to-day operations. Once a baseline response and recovery time objective has been identified, tested and regularly met, it may be time to rein in breach budgets and instead concentrate on line-of-business benefits.

The cost of a security incident is going up for SMBs and enterprises alike. Tamping down total spend means better employee training, involving C-suite and recognizing that no matter how big the budget, breaches are part of the business.

More from

Bridging the 3.4 Million Workforce Gap in Cybersecurity

As new cybersecurity threats continue to loom, the industry is running short of workers to face them. The 2022 (ISC)2 Cybersecurity Workforce Study identified a 3.4 million worldwide cybersecurity worker gap; the total existing workforce is estimated at 4.7 million. Yet despite adding workers this past year, that gap continued to widen.Nearly 12,000 participants in that study felt that additional staff would have a hugely positive impact on their ability to perform their duties. More hires would boost proper risk…

The Evolution of Antivirus Software to Face Modern Threats

Over the years, endpoint security has evolved from primitive antivirus software to more sophisticated next-generation platforms employing advanced technology and better endpoint detection and response.  Because of the increased threat that modern cyberattacks pose, experts are exploring more elegant ways of keeping data safe from threats.Signature-Based Antivirus SoftwareSignature-based detection is the use of footprints to identify malware. All programs, applications, software and files have a digital footprint. Buried within their code, these digital footprints or signatures are unique to the respective…

How Do Threat Hunters Keep Organizations Safe?

Neil Wyler started his job amid an ongoing cyberattack. As a threat hunter, he helped his client discover that millions of records had been stolen over four months. Even though his client used sophisticated tools, its threat-hunting technology did not detect the attack because the transactions looked normal. But with Wyler’s expertise, he was able to realize that data was leaving the environment as well as entering the system. His efforts saved the company from suffering even more damage and…

The White House on Quantum Encryption and IoT Labels

A recent White House Fact Sheet outlined the current and future U.S. cybersecurity priorities. While most of the topics covered were in line with expectations, others drew more attention. The emphasis on critical infrastructure protection is clearly a top national priority. However, the plan is to create a labeling system for IoT devices, identifying the ones with the highest cybersecurity standards. Few expected that news. The topic of quantum-resistant encryption reveals that such concerns may become a reality sooner than…