Ransomware attacks are getting worse. That’s the word from Sophos chief Kris Hagerman, who recently told The Telegraph, “We are probably in the early innings of the threat posed by ransomware.”

A quick look at the file lockdown landscape lends credence to the argument. As noted by Bleeping Computer, new variants such as LockCrypt are now targeting unsecured enterprise servers with solid encryption and advanced obfuscation techniques. They are demanding between $3,500 and $7,000 per device for decryption keys, paid in bitcoin.

From RaaS to RDP Rampage

LockCrypt got its start under the umbrella of the Satan ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS), which lets would-be attackers piggyback on existing malware code to infect corporate systems. As noted by ZDNet, the Satan HTML file uses RSA-2048 and AES-256 cryptography, making it difficult — if not impossible — for victims to recover files unless they’re willing to pay.

The catch? Satan’s creators take a 30 percent share of all profits generated, making it a great entry-level option but not ideal for long-term gains.

Early versions of LockCrypt used email addresses associated with the Satan RaaS, but more recent attacks have ditched Satan infection vectors in favor of brute-force remote desktop protocol (RDP) attacks that compromise unsecured enterprise servers and then move laterally to as many devices as possible.

Victims receive a visual warning telling them files have been encrypted and directing them to a Readme file, which contains details on how to pay the ransom and recover file control. Analyzing bitcoin wallet IDs used in ransom demands, security researchers discovered the LockCrypt creators have already generated more than $175,000 in payments.

Full-Featured Ransomware Attacks

While initial versions of LockCrypt weren’t particularly complex, current attack vectors come with a number of features that make it a threat worth watching. First, the ransomware leverages strong encryption to prevent users and security firms from finding simple workarounds.

LockCrypt also gains boot persistence and deletes shadow volume copies, hampering the ability of users to remove infected code. Last but not least? It kills all non-Windows core processes, effectively curtailing the ability of antivirus or antimalware tools to detect and eliminate the ransomware.

LockCrypt isn’t the first ransomware to make the move from spam kits to RDP brute-force attacks, but it certainly raises the bar in terms of complexity and persistence. More importantly, it represents a marked shift from pay-to-play exploit kits to custom-designed malware. Now, these kits are giving low-level actors the tools and training they need to get started and experiment, in turn allowing them to develop targeted ransomware strains capable of backing users into a virtual corner and leaving them little choice but to pay up.

The corporate takeaway? Resecure RDP access points ASAP, make sure to regularly update remote desktop defense and reduce or eliminate the use of RDP wherever possible to minimize total risk. More importantly? Recognize the hallmarks of new ransomware attacks: custom-built, clever and feature-complete.

More from

Emotional Blowback: Dealing With Post-Incident Stress

Cyberattacks are on the rise as adversaries find new ways of creating chaos and increasing profits. Attacks evolve constantly and often involve real-world consequences. The growing criminal Software-as-a-Service enterprise puts ready-made tools in the hands of threat actors who can use them against the software supply chain and other critical systems. And then there's the threat of nation-state attacks, with major incidents reported every month and no sign of them slowing. Amidst these growing concerns, cybersecurity professionals continue to report…

RansomExx Upgrades to Rust

IBM Security X-Force Threat Researchers have discovered a new variant of the RansomExx ransomware that has been rewritten in the Rust programming language, joining a growing trend of ransomware developers switching to the language. Malware written in Rust often benefits from lower AV detection rates (compared to those written in more common languages) and this may have been the primary reason to use the language. For example, the sample analyzed in this report was not detected as malicious in the…

Why Operational Technology Security Cannot Be Avoided

Operational technology (OT) includes any hardware and software that directly monitors and controls industrial equipment and all its assets, processes and events to detect or initiate a change. Yet despite occupying a critical role in a large number of essential industries, OT security is also uniquely vulnerable to attack. From power grids to nuclear plants, attacks on OT systems have caused devastating work interruptions and physical damage in industries across the globe. In fact, cyberattacks with OT targets have substantially…

Resilient Companies Have a Disaster Recovery Plan

Historically, disaster recovery (DR) planning focused on protection against unlikely events such as fires, floods and natural disasters. Some companies mistakenly view DR as an insurance policy for which the likelihood of a claim is low. With the current financial and economic pressures, cutting or underfunding DR planning is a tempting prospect for many organizations. That impulse could be costly. Unfortunately, many companies have adopted newer technology delivery models without DR in mind, such as Cloud Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)…