February 12, 2024 By Mark Stone 4 min read

As cyber threats show no sign of slowing down in terms of sophistication and frequency, the role of the National Cyber Director (NCD) in the United States is becoming a cornerstone of the nation’s defense strategy. Inaugural NCD Chris Inglis set a high bar for the office during his tenure, steering the country through a gauntlet of cyber challenges.

Now, as Harry Coker Jr. steps into this critical role, he faces a landscape that continues to evolve with new threats on one side and opportunities on the other. The country is poised for a significant transformation in its cybersecurity approach, ready to address the challenges with innovative strategies and decisive action.

But as the NCD transitions between Inglis and Coker, how will their distinct visions differ?

Setting a precedent

Chris Inglis, a seasoned cybersecurity expert, approached his role with a clear vision. During his tenure, he made significant strides in shaping the nation’s cybersecurity framework.

Inglis championed a robust strategy that emphasized both technological defenses and the crucial role of human responsibility and cooperation across sectors. Despite seemingly overwhelming hurdles — like the complexities of implementing wide-ranging policies and coordinating between various agencies — Inglis carved out a solid foundation for his successors.

His approach set the bar for a responsive and dynamic cybersecurity strategy.

New vision, new challenges

Coker steps into the role with a wealth of experience in national security and intelligence; his confirmation indicates a continued commitment to strengthening the nation’s cyber defenses.

It’s too early to make assumptions about Coker’s vision, but in his confirmation hearings, we know it aligns with the White House’s national cybersecurity strategy.

The emphasis under Coker will be on a collaborative approach, ensuring that federal agencies and the private sector are compliant and proactive in their cybersecurity measures. Coker’s leadership is expected to drive the implementation of critical cybersecurity initiatives, creating a new chapter in the nation’s digital defense narrative.

Coker’s challenges are numerous: he is tasked with translating the established policies of his predecessor into practical actions and measurable outcomes. Right off the bat, Coker will need to gain a deep understanding of the existing cybersecurity framework and the flexibility to adapt and evolve the strategies to meet emerging threats and technological advancements.

The expectations surrounding his leadership include a strong emphasis on operational effectiveness, agility in response to new challenges and a continued commitment to advancing the United States’ position in global cybersecurity. It’s safe to assume Coker will continue to integrate cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence into cybersecurity strategies to align with global trends and the increasing sophistication of cyber threats.

Predictably, Coker’s tenure should focus on strengthening the collaboration between various government agencies and the private sector. His ability to foster a culture of cooperation and shared responsibility will be key to the success of the United States’ cybersecurity initiatives under his leadership.

Predictions for the new NCD

The transition from Chris Inglis to Harry Coker as the National Cyber Director could mark a pivotal shift in the United States’ cybersecurity strategy.

Inglis tackled the foundational work of establishing the office and setting a strategic direction for national cyber defense. He also developed comprehensive policies and fostered collaboration between public and private sectors — essentially creating a blueprint for U.S. cybersecurity. Coker inherits a well-defined role with the foundational elements already in place. His role will likely focus more on action and implementation, using Inglis’s broad strategic outlines as a stepping stone to a more hands-on approach to address the rapidly evolving cyber landscape. Ultimately, it’s about turning theoretical frameworks into concrete actions.

Coker’s background in intelligence and national security suggests he may adopt a more dynamic approach to dealing with cyber threats, emphasizing rapid response and operational efficiency. The expected shift from strategic development to implementation is an important part of preparing the country for future challenges.

In addition, Coker’s approach to technology and AI integration might be more aggressive compared to his predecessor.

Coker’s tenure might also bring new perspectives to international cyber policy and collaboration. While maintaining the alliances and partnerships established during Inglis’s tenure, Coker will likely approach these international dynamics with a fresh perspective, adapting to the global nature of cybersecurity challenges.

The NCD’s relationship with other agencies

The National Cyber Director operates within a complex network of relationships with key U.S. government entities that collectively shape and execute national cybersecurity strategies.

The NCD’s role extends to coordinating with various government agencies involved in different aspects of cybersecurity, ranging from defense and security to commerce and energy, which provide a unified approach to cyber threats that leverage the strengths and expertise of each agency.

The White House

Perhaps most importantly, the NCD’s relationship with the White House — where the NCD advises the president on cybersecurity policy — must be as robust as possible to align with broader national security goals.

The Pentagon

The NCD’s collaboration with the Pentagon cannot be overlooked, as it combines the NCD’s broad cybersecurity focus with the Pentagon’s emphasis on defense and military cyber operations to present a unified national defense posture against cyber threats.


Another critical relationship for the NCD is with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). While the NCD formulates overarching cybersecurity policies, CISA is tasked with implementing these policies on the ground to protect the country’s critical infrastructure. This partnership is the personification of the synergy between strategy and execution, with both entities working hand in hand to protect national interests in cyberspace.

The private sector

Beyond government entities, the NCD’s relationship with the private sector is equally critical, especially since much of the nation’s critical infrastructure is privately owned and operated. The NCD’s ability to bridge these sectors is key for a shared responsibility model, leading the way to a robust and resilient national cybersecurity posture.

The transition from Inglis to Coker marks a significant moment in the evolution of U.S. cybersecurity. While Inglis laid the foundational strategy, Coker is poised to drive its implementation.

More from News

Regulatory harmonization in OT-critical infrastructure faces hurdles

3 min read - In an effort to enhance cyber resilience across critical infrastructure, the Office of the National Cyber Director (ONCD) has recently released a summary of feedback from its 2023 Cybersecurity Regulatory Harmonization Request for Information (RFI). The responses reveal major concerns from critical infrastructure industries related to operational technology (OT), such as energy, transport and manufacturing. Their worries include the current fragmented regulatory landscape and difficulty adapting to new cyber regulations. The frustration appears to be unanimous. Meanwhile, the magnitude of…

Why the Christie’s auction house hack is different

3 min read - Christie's, one of the world's leading auction houses, was hacked in May, and the cyber group RansomHub has claimed responsibility. On May 12, Christie’s CEO Guillaume Cerutti announced on LinkedIn that the company had “experienced a technology security incident.” RansomHub threatened to leak “sensitive personal information” from exfiltrated ID document data, including names, dates of birth and nationalities. On the group’s dark website, RansomHub claims to possess 2GB of data on “at least 500,000” Christie’s clients from around the world.…

Should there be a total ban on ransomware payments?

3 min read - The debate about the United States government banning companies from making ransomware payments is back in the headlines. Recently, the Ransomware Task Force for the Institute for Security and Technology released a memo on the topic. The task force stated that making a ban on ransomware payments in the U.S. at the current time will worsen the harm to victims, society and the economy. Additionally, small businesses cannot withstand a lengthy business disruption and might go out of business after…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today