March 17, 2015 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

In a secret, 14–1 vote on March 12, the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee approved the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA), which encourages companies to share cyberthreat data with one another and the federal government. Some call the cyberthreat sharing bill a step in the right direction for national security, while others are worried it doesn’t do enough to protect the privacy of American citizens. What does this share-and-share-alike measure really mean for U.S. companies?

The Aim

There are several cybersecurity bills trying to make inroads with Senate committees this year. Along with CISA, there is also the Cyber Threat Sharing Act, introduced by Sen. Tom Carper, and the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA). The bills all focus on encouraging companies to share cyberthreat data with each other and the federal government. CISA would also protect companies from consumer lawsuits based on the disclosure or contents of this data. Ideally, information would be shared in as near to real time as possible to encourage prompt and effective security responses. While Carper’s bill hasn’t yet been acted on and CISPA may be stalling, CISA was quietly approved last week.

The Concern

When the first draft of CISA was released, 26 digital rights groups and 22 security experts signed a letter opposing its contents. The biggest bones of contention were that the original draft gave the National Security Agency (NSA) automatic access to personal data companies shared with government agencies and that companies were permitted to engage in “dangerous” countermeasures during cyberattacks.

After taking feedback, the Senate committee agreed to review the bill and make changes. However, these changes were not made public before the secret vote took place. Now, watchdog groups are concerned that any new privacy measures won’t be enough to protect the interests of citizens and companies in the United States.

In fact, the bill’s lone dissenting voter, Sen. Ron Wyden, called CISA “a surveillance bill by another name,” and believes the bill “lacks adequate protections for the privacy rights of American consumers, and that it will have a limited impact on U.S. cybersecurity,” according to The Hill.

The Future?

The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act isn’t law yet, but the Senate vote puts it one step closer to becoming a reality. The bill holds some merit, since increased cyberthreat data sharing among companies could help slow the spread of malware. Rather than acting as technological islands, businesses could help sink malicious code by making new vulnerabilities common knowledge.

However, any bill that grants the NSA access to private information without oversight and isn’t clear on exactly how companies will be protected from information disclosures is bound to make citizens nervous. President Barack Obama has stated several times that he would veto any version of CISPA that reaches his desk; the same may extend to CISA.

U.S. cybersecurity remains a hot-button topic as new malware emerges and companies across markets and industries find themselves under threat. While information collaboration has the potential to empower the good guys, secret votes and broad federal powers may not be the best way to encourage sharing.

More from

What does resilience in the cyber world look like in 2025 and beyond?

6 min read -  Back in 2021, we ran a series called “A Journey in Organizational Resilience.” These issues of this series remain applicable today and, in many cases, are more important than ever, given the rapid changes of the last few years. But the term "resilience" can be difficult to define, and when we define it, we may limit its scope, missing the big picture.In the age of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI), the prevalence of breach data from infostealers and the near-constant…

Airplane cybersecurity: Past, present, future

4 min read - With most aviation processes now digitized, airlines and the aviation industry as a whole must prioritize cybersecurity. If a cyber criminal launches an attack that affects a system involved in aviation — either an airline’s system or a third-party vendor — the entire process, from safety to passenger comfort, may be impacted.To improve security in the aviation industry, the FAA recently proposed new rules to tighten cybersecurity on airplanes. These rules would “protect the equipment, systems and networks of transport…

Protecting your digital assets from non-human identity attacks

4 min read - Untethered data accessibility and workflow automation are now foundational elements of most digital infrastructures. With the right applications and protocols in place, businesses no longer need to feel restricted by their lack of manpower or technical capabilities — machines are now filling those gaps.The use of non-human identities (NHIs) to power business-critical applications — especially those used in cloud computing environments or when facilitating service-to-service connections — has opened the doors for seamless operational efficiency. Unfortunately, these doors aren’t the…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today