May 16, 2016 By Patricia Diaz 2 min read

Today more than ever, enterprise access control has been stretched thin as more third-party apps, suppliers and new technologies enter the corporate network.

What Aggravates Access Risk?

Complexity comes as a result of new functionalities and networks entering the corporate environment. Beyond managing growing active directories, corporate access management has become more complex due to systems that have their own access management controls — think new mobile, social and cloud applications. Crawford asked, “How many access control systems does your organization have — really?” Answering this question is essential to surveying your environment and identifying relevant risks.

In effect, access management complexity becomes more than just managing users in the system. It’s also about finding ways to stay in control of the enterprise and its new third-party apps and functionalities.

That said, with complexity being an increasingly relevant risk factor, so is the complacency with which organizations manage access. In most environments, Crawford explained, complacency boils down to two main factors: too much and too long. There’s too much unrestricted high-privilege access with out-of-date policies. Risks that are far too real remain for too long, and cybercriminals learn to exploit them.

Hidden Risks: Complexity and Complacency?

The first step in tackling hidden risks is centralizing access management.

“We see many people having deployed many access management solutions for [mobile and cloud] technologies,” Brandon Whichard of IBM Product Marketing explained during the second half of the webinar. “If you have five different access management solutions, you don’t have any access management because it is so complicated to manage.”

Once access is centralized in one appliance, the enterprise can start truly taking control of its access management and governance. As such, Whichard introduced IBM’s three-question framework for taking control of identity and access management. Organizations should ask themselves:

  1. Is this really a valid user?
  2. What does the user want to do?
  3. What access does that user need to do his or her job?

In response, the enterprise can take the following corresponding actions:

  1. Look at parameters that enable risk-based access control.
  2. Flag and record business behavior with a trust-but-verify approach.
  3. Ensure IT understands what business users need to do their jobs to make auditing a smoother and more accurate process.

Moving Forward With Access Management

Centralizing access management is the first step to truly getting a grip on access management and taking back control of enterprise access and risk. When selecting the appliance best for your organization, I encourage you to revisit Whichard’s framework to ensure your solution can help you answer all three essential questions.

Download this white paper to learn how to Take back control of access management

More from Identity & Access

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Obtaining security clearance: Hurdles and requirements

3 min read - As security moves closer to the top of the operational priority list for private and public organizations, needing to obtain a security clearance for jobs is more commonplace. Security clearance is a prerequisite for a wide range of roles, especially those related to national security and defense.Obtaining that clearance, however, is far from simple. The process often involves scrutinizing one’s background, financial history and even personal character. Let’s briefly explore some of the hurdles, expectations and requirements of obtaining a…

From federation to fabric: IAM’s evolution

15 min read - In the modern day, we’ve come to expect that our various applications can share our identity information with one another. Most of our core systems federate seamlessly and bi-directionally. This means that you can quite easily register and log in to a given service with the user account from another service or even invert that process (technically possible, not always advisable). But what is the next step in our evolution towards greater interoperability between our applications, services and systems?Identity and…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today