DemonBot Targeting Hadoop Clusters to Perform DDoS Attacks

A new bot called DemonBot is targeting Hadoop clusters to execute distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks.

The Radware Threat Research Center recently observed a threat actor exploiting a Hadoop Yet Another Resource Negotiator (YARN) unauthenticated remote command execution. This method of attack enables the malicious agent to infect clusters of Hadoop, an open source distributed processing framework that helps big data apps run in clustered systems, with DemonBot. Upon successful infection, the threat connects to its command-and-control (C&C) server and transmits information about the infected device.

Why Cloud Infrastructure Servers Are Juicy Targets

The threat’s goal is to leverage infected cloud infrastructure servers to conduct DDoS attacks. At this juncture, it is not exhibiting worm-like behavior akin to Mirai. Instead, it relies on 70 exploit servers for distribution, infrastructure that helps it perform 1 million exploits every day.

That being said, Radware found DemonBot to be binary-compatible with most Internet of Things (IoT) devices, which means the threat could spread to other types of products.

DemonBot isn’t the first bot to target cloud infrastructure servers like Hadoop clusters. In early October, a security researcher reported on Twitter that handlers of the Sora IoT botnet attempted to exploit the same YARN abused by DemonBot.

Radware attributed the growing interest in Hadoop to the fact that cloud infrastructure servers allow bad actors to stage larger and more stable DDoS attacks using multiple vectors, such as User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) floods.

How to Defend Against DemonBot

Security professionals can help protect their organizations against DemonBot by conducting a proper risk assessment on their cloud deployment. From there, they should enlist the help of penetration testers to map the vulnerabilities affecting their deployment.

Security teams should also look to invest in mitigation tools and services that specialize in defending against a DDoS attack.

Sources: Radware, Ankit Anubhav

David Bisson

Contributing Editor

Unified endpoint management for purpose-based devices

4 min read - As purpose-built devices become increasingly common, the challenges associated with their unique management and security needs are becoming clear. What are purpose-built devices? Most fall under the category of rugged IoT devices typically used outside of an office environment and which often run on a different operating system than typical office devices. Examples include ruggedized tablets and smartphones, handheld scanners and kiosks. Many different industries are utilizing purpose-built devices, including travel and transportation, retail, warehouse and distribution, manufacturing (including automotive)…

Stealthy WailingCrab Malware misuses MQTT Messaging Protocol

14 min read - This article was made possible thanks to the hard work of writer Charlotte Hammond and contributions from Ole Villadsen and Kat Metrick. IBM X-Force researchers have been tracking developments to the WailingCrab malware family, in particular, those relating to its C2 communication mechanisms, which include misusing the Internet-of-Things (IoT) messaging protocol MQTT. WailingCrab, also known as WikiLoader, is a sophisticated, multi-component malware delivered almost exclusively by an initial access broker that X-Force tracks as Hive0133, which overlaps with TA544. WailingCrab…

Operationalize cyber risk quantification for smart security

4 min read - Organizations constantly face new tactics from cyber criminals who aim to compromise their most valuable assets. Yet despite evolving techniques, many security leaders still rely on subjective terms, such as low, medium and high, to communicate and manage cyber risk. These vague terms do not convey the necessary detail or insight to produce actionable outcomes that accurately identify, measure, manage and communicate cyber risks. As a result, executives and board members remain uninformed and ill-prepared to manage organizational risk effectively.…

Pentesting vs. Pentesting as a Service: Which is better?

5 min read - In today's quickly evolving cybersecurity landscape, organizations constantly seek the most effective ways to secure their digital assets. Penetration testing (pentesting) has emerged as a leading solution for identifying potential system vulnerabilities while closing security gaps that can lead to an attack. At the same time, a newer entrant into the security arena is Pentesting as a Service (PTaaS). Although PTaaS shares some similarities with pentesting, distinct differences make them two separate solutions. This article will discuss how these methodologies…

Security Intelligence

{{title}}

{{title}}

{{title}}

{{title}}

Topics

Why Cloud Infrastructure Servers Are Juicy Targets

How to Defend Against DemonBot

More from

Unified endpoint management for purpose-based devices

Stealthy WailingCrab Malware misuses MQTT Messaging Protocol

Operationalize cyber risk quantification for smart security

Pentesting vs. Pentesting as a Service: Which is better?

Topic updates