October 6, 2016 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks are nothing new. Cybercriminals have been recruiting bots to do their dirty work for years, manipulating them into spamming company websites and causing collateral damage. What’s more, many companies feel the frequency of DDoS attacks isn’t decreasing.

DDoS attacks remain safe bets for cybercriminals looking to sow chaos or throw up smoke screens for more nefarious acts. According to Infosecurity Magazine, findings from a recent Neustar study backed up the feeling: In the last 12 months, almost 75 percent of all global firms suffered a DDoS attack, with half losing $100,000 per hour during peak periods.

Neustar Study Showed Startling Numbers

The numbers from Neustar don’t look promising: Of the nearly 750 C-suite executives who said they were victims of attack, 85 percent noted their company was hit by multiple DDoS attacks over the last year, while 29 percent came under attack between two and five times.

Just under half of respondents lost $100,000 during peak hours of bot takedown traffic, and one-third suffered losses of $250,000 or more. It gets worse — more than 70 percent of those asked said it took at least an hour to detect the DDoS attacks and another full hour to respond, meaning a minimum of $200,000 lost even if detection and defense came with relative ease.

Part of the problem is the increasing number of vulnerable IoT devices. Consider the recent Mirai attacks that leveraged IoT devices, such as remote cameras, to create a massive botnet army capable of attack volumes. While the underlying concept of DDoS hasn’t changed in years, it’s getting new lease on life thanks to the huge volume of unsecured, network-enabled devices now linked to the public internet.

Sophisticated and Relentless

DDoS attacks are occurring more frequently, and attackers are using them for more than just website takedowns. According to We Live Security, these denial-of-service efforts may be decoys meant to divert attention away from other, more worrisome attack routes. The Neustar study data bears this out, with more than half of respondents saying they’ve experienced additional compromises, such as virus, malware or ransomware infections, during a DDoS attack.

While IT professionals are focused on getting websites back online and stemming the tide of bot traffic, it’s often possible for attackers to slip small packages of code through strained security systems. If they’re smart, they dump Trojans onto the network and wait until the dust settles. When admins are back to business as usual, actors execute their package and start grabbing corporate data.

Regardless off their origin, motivation or speed, it’s clear that DDoS attacks remain a key antagonist in the IT security story. Now empowered by IoT devices and leveraged as expensive decoys, it’s no wonder so many firms have seen networks go down and IT outrage ramp up in the last 12 months.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today