October 6, 2016 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks are nothing new. Cybercriminals have been recruiting bots to do their dirty work for years, manipulating them into spamming company websites and causing collateral damage. What’s more, many companies feel the frequency of DDoS attacks isn’t decreasing.

DDoS attacks remain safe bets for cybercriminals looking to sow chaos or throw up smoke screens for more nefarious acts. According to Infosecurity Magazine, findings from a recent Neustar study backed up the feeling: In the last 12 months, almost 75 percent of all global firms suffered a DDoS attack, with half losing $100,000 per hour during peak periods.

Neustar Study Showed Startling Numbers

The numbers from Neustar don’t look promising: Of the nearly 750 C-suite executives who said they were victims of attack, 85 percent noted their company was hit by multiple DDoS attacks over the last year, while 29 percent came under attack between two and five times.

Just under half of respondents lost $100,000 during peak hours of bot takedown traffic, and one-third suffered losses of $250,000 or more. It gets worse — more than 70 percent of those asked said it took at least an hour to detect the DDoS attacks and another full hour to respond, meaning a minimum of $200,000 lost even if detection and defense came with relative ease.

Part of the problem is the increasing number of vulnerable IoT devices. Consider the recent Mirai attacks that leveraged IoT devices, such as remote cameras, to create a massive botnet army capable of attack volumes. While the underlying concept of DDoS hasn’t changed in years, it’s getting new lease on life thanks to the huge volume of unsecured, network-enabled devices now linked to the public internet.

Sophisticated and Relentless

DDoS attacks are occurring more frequently, and attackers are using them for more than just website takedowns. According to We Live Security, these denial-of-service efforts may be decoys meant to divert attention away from other, more worrisome attack routes. The Neustar study data bears this out, with more than half of respondents saying they’ve experienced additional compromises, such as virus, malware or ransomware infections, during a DDoS attack.

While IT professionals are focused on getting websites back online and stemming the tide of bot traffic, it’s often possible for attackers to slip small packages of code through strained security systems. If they’re smart, they dump Trojans onto the network and wait until the dust settles. When admins are back to business as usual, actors execute their package and start grabbing corporate data.

Regardless off their origin, motivation or speed, it’s clear that DDoS attacks remain a key antagonist in the IT security story. Now empowered by IoT devices and leveraged as expensive decoys, it’s no wonder so many firms have seen networks go down and IT outrage ramp up in the last 12 months.

More from

Cloud Threat Landscape Report: AI-generated attacks low for the cloud

2 min read - For the last couple of years, a lot of attention has been placed on the evolutionary state of artificial intelligence (AI) technology and its impact on cybersecurity. In many industries, the risks associated with AI-generated attacks are still present and concerning, especially with the global average of data breach costs increasing by 10% from last year.However, according to the most recent Cloud Threat Landscape Report released by IBM’s X-Force team, the near-term threat of an AI-generated attack targeting cloud computing…

Testing the limits of generative AI: How red teaming exposes vulnerabilities in AI models

4 min read - With generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) on the frontlines of information security, red teams play an essential role in identifying vulnerabilities that others can overlook.With the average cost of a data breach reaching an all-time high of $4.88 million in 2024, businesses need to know exactly where their vulnerabilities lie. Given the remarkable pace at which they’re adopting gen AI, there’s a good chance that some of those vulnerabilities lie in AI models themselves — or the data used to…

FBI, CISA issue warning for cross Apple-Android texting

3 min read - CISA and the FBI recently released a joint statement that the People's Republic of China (PRC) is targeting commercial telecommunications infrastructure as part of a significant cyber espionage campaign. As a result, the agencies released a joint guide, Enhanced Visibility and Hardening Guidance for Communications Infrastructure, with best practices organizations and agencies should adopt to protect against this espionage threat. According to the statement, PRC-affiliated actors compromised networks at multiple telecommunication companies. They stole customer call records data as well…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today