COVID-19 may have given cybersecurity talent retention an artificial prop up over the last two years. For example, job satisfaction was on a downward trend from 2018 to 2019, but with the pandemic came a plateau in 2020 and 2021. Was the plateau due to newfound satisfaction or were there other factors, such as economic instability, lockdowns and mandates?

It’s hard to know for sure, but based on a recent ISACA State of Cybersecurity survey, it appears that 2020 and 2021 were a ‘blip’ on the satisfaction meter, with downward trends back again. Today,  pandemic restrictions are being lifted. With employees expecting different things – such as remote work – employers need to keep a close eye on retention once again. 

Dissatisfaction on the Rise

According to the survey, security leaders are finding it harder to retain cybersecurity workers. Meanwhile, teams are already understaffed and vacancies remain unfilled. The most common factors for employees leaving are:

  • Recruited by other companies
  • Poor salaries and bonuses
  • Limited promotion and development
  • High work stress levels
  • Lack of management support.

Also, cybersecurity workers are feeling ‘completely checked out’ because of the work environment and burnout, resulting in doing the bare minimum. Artificial intelligence and other tools, such as monitoring and orchestration, can help, but humans are behind these wheels. Add into the mix work becoming tedious, resulting in repetitive and manual tasks which are not fulfilling and take time away from programs that can improve overall security posture and resilience.

Find the Counterbalance 

From the list above, look at the second and third points: poor financial offerings and limited mobility and development. These can be connected and are reason enough to start looking. Compound them with the other issues, and you have a definite flight risk.

We have talked about success as a chief information security officer being about more than just technical knowledge. Security and cyber consulting workers must up their people skills. That’s not always about being ‘nice’ or ‘understanding’, or even empathetic. It’s about fulfillment, so find the counterbalance.

For example, you might manage a job that calls for someone to be ‘always on’, such as incident response. The counterbalance may be a pay premium. If you can’t afford a pay premium, seek other incentives, such as ‘no-disruption zones’. That means once your employee finishes their shift for the day, ensure nothing disrupts them until the next workday. This may mean changing your working model and staffing hours for shifts.

Of course, all this is easier said than done. Some methods may not be practical for your business. But, don’t forget one of the most important business truths: a shortage of workers means your business can’t carry out the work.

Fulfillment: Fill It or Someone Else May

For leaders and managers, retaining talent will come down to having insight into what drives your employees. You could throw a handful of cash at one person and they’ll be happy, whereas that approach can backfire with someone else, even if in a similar role.

Why? Because people have different drivers. One person can be happy with the cash, whereas the other may want to own and run a project, have the certainty of uninterrupted private time, the freedom to work from home or support for more professional training. Or all of the above!

Don’t think others, such as competitors, will sit idly by. With talent hard to find, they’ll exploit this for their own benefit.

Retention is closely tied to a leader and manager’s skill at knowing what drives their staff. You will not be able to please everyone, but you want to stop the bleed. If you lose one, more are likely to follow, and that may require some time for you to look in the mirror and figure out the root cause.

More from CISO

Bringing threat intelligence and adversary insights to the forefront: X-Force Research Hub

3 min read - Today defenders are dealing with both a threat landscape that’s constantly changing and attacks that have stood the test of time. Innovation and best practices co-exist in the criminal world, and one mustn’t distract us from the other. IBM X-Force is continuously observing new attack vectors and novel malware in the wild, as adversaries seek to evade detection innovations. But we also know that tried and true tactics — from phishing and exploiting known vulnerabilities to using compromised credentials and…

What’s new in the 2023 Cost of a Data Breach report

3 min read - Data breach costs continue to grow, according to new research, reaching a record-high global average of $4.45 million, representing a 15% increase over three years. Costs in the healthcare industry continued to top the charts, as the most expensive industry for the 13th year in a row. Yet as breach costs continue to climb, the research points to new opportunities for containing breach costs. The research, conducted independently by Ponemon Institute and analyzed and published by IBM Security, constitutes the…

Cyber leaders: Stop being your own worst career enemy. Here’s how.

24 min read - Listen to this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you find your favorite audio content. We’ve been beating the cyber talent shortage drum for a while now, and with good reason. The vacancy numbers are staggering, with some in the industry reporting as many as 3.5 million unfilled positions as of April 2023 and projecting the disparity between supply and demand will remain until 2025. Perhaps one of the best (and arguably only) ways we can realistically bridge this gap is to…

Poor communication during a data breach can cost you — Here’s how to avoid it

5 min read - No one needs to tell you that data breaches are costly. That data has been quantified and the numbers are staggering. In fact, the IBM Security Cost of a Data Breach estimates that the average cost of a data breach in 2022 was $4.35 million, with 83% of organizations experiencing one or more security incidents. But what’s talked about less often (and we think should be talked about more) is how communication — both good and bad — factors into…