As enterprises undergo digital transformation and explore new opportunities offered by cloud technology, many lose sight of the digital risks they’ve encountered along the way. Like the pioneers who headed into the Wild West more than a century ago, companies today face a range of unseen dangers as they move unwittingly into potentially hostile territory. From developers and engineers collaborating via cloud-based, consumer-focused data sharing platforms to independent contractors retaining access credentials long after their projects are completed, the risks to critical data are expanding along with the attack surface.

Whether it’s digital transformation, cloud computing, extended supply chains or outsourcing, it’s imperative for organizations to establish a formal data risk management program that’s more than just a governance, risk and compliance program designed to check the boxes for auditors. Data risk management programs put mission-critical data — an organization’s crown jewels — at the center of the effort. Ensuring the confidentiality, integrity and availability of that data, no matter where it lives or who touches it, is the top priority.

Join the Nov. 1 webinar

Round Up the Posse: The Importance of Multiple Stakeholders

To be successful, a data risk management program requires the involvement of multiple stakeholders, including data owners; line-of-business managers; IT and security professionals; legal, HR and finance departments; and multiple members of the C-suite, all the way up to the CEO. All these parties have a hand in identifying the enterprise’s crown jewels, where they are located, who handles or processes them and where they flow not only within the organization, but outside of it as well.

An effective program also requires input from security professionals who can understand how the inherent risks of ownership, privilege rights, locality, sensitivity and complexities associated with third-party application integrations can be used as backdoors into mission-critical data or cause serious business disruption.

Other common challenges organizations encounter when developing a data risk management program include:

  • Manual process bottlenecks that greatly impact the organization’s ability to scale;
  • Siloed IT systems, each with their own data store, that lack sufficient controls and make it difficult to prioritize risk, thereby creating the potential for exposure;
  • Friction between IT operations and security teams due to the lack of a common language and differing priorities, which makes it hard for them to work in concert to prioritize risks and take immediate remediation actions in the event of a serious breach; and
  • The ability to distinguish between pedestrian events and those that could disrupt business operations, such as the theft and disclosure of sensitive intellectual property (IP).

Take the Reins: Developing Measurements That Actually Mean Something

Successful data risk management programs require security professionals to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) or risk measurements that actually mean something to business executives. Tactical metrics and reporting from tools designed to serve the needs of security analysts do not translate well into the language of business risk. However, by ingesting useful data from a range of security tools that can then be combined with other strategic operational metrics and contextual information, it’s possible to present such data to business executives in a way that allows them to better grasp where existing security controls are adequate and where additional resources are needed.

Such tools include security information and event management (SIEM), data loss prevention (DLP), application security, security response management, vulnerability assessment, and data monitoring systems. A dashboard that takes all that highly technical data and boils it down to sensible risk measurements can benefit multiple stakeholders within an organization as they work to mature their data risk management practices. A data risk manager with a business-centric approach can reduce the time it takes to investigate and remediate threats, and potentially avoid or minimize damages and cost.

Circle the Wagons: It’s Time for a Focused Data Risk Management Program

As enterprises embrace digitization, cloud and IT automation, most are still in the pioneering stages — if they’ve begun at all — of developing a data risk management program. With a vastly expanded threat surface, highly sophisticated and well-funded threat actors seemingly immune to law enforcement, and increasingly complex and porous organizational structures, it’s time to circle the wagons around mission-critical data assets. There’s no better time to create a programmatic approach by automating and orchestrating data risk management.

Join the Nov. 1 webinar

More from Data Protection

3 Strategies to overcome data security challenges in 2024

3 min read - There are over 17 billion internet-connected devices in the world — and experts expect that number will surge to almost 30 billion by 2030.This rapidly growing digital ecosystem makes it increasingly challenging to protect people’s privacy. Attackers only need to be right once to seize databases of personally identifiable information (PII), including payment card information, addresses, phone numbers and Social Security numbers.In addition to the ever-present cybersecurity threats, data security teams must consider the growing list of data compliance laws…

How data residency impacts security and compliance

3 min read - Every piece of your organization’s data is stored in a physical location. Even data stored in a cloud environment lives in a physical location on the virtual server. However, the data may not be in the location you expect, especially if your company uses multiple cloud providers. The data you are trying to protect may be stored literally across the world from where you sit right now or even in multiple locations at the same time. And if you don’t…

From federation to fabric: IAM’s evolution

15 min read - In the modern day, we’ve come to expect that our various applications can share our identity information with one another. Most of our core systems federate seamlessly and bi-directionally. This means that you can quite easily register and log in to a given service with the user account from another service or even invert that process (technically possible, not always advisable). But what is the next step in our evolution towards greater interoperability between our applications, services and systems?Identity and…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today